From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: walter harms Subject: Re: RFC: Bug 60749 - Do not need to link against -lm for fabs*() Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 14:05:48 +0200 Message-ID: <5234511C.7030500@bfs.de> References: <5233415A.90506@bfs.de> Reply-To: wharms-fPG8STNUNVg@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Cc: linux-man List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Am 13.09.2013 20:20, schrieb Michael Kerrisk (man-pages): > Walter, > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:46 PM, walter harms wrote: >> hi list, >> i was investigating this and the good news it that you still need a libm. >> On the other side the reporter is right he does not need to specify that. >> Obviously this depends on the linker script used. >> >> The math man pages say: "Link with -lm". >> Perhaps it is better to say 'You may need to Link with -lm". >> >> any comments on that ? > > > Thanks for looking at this bug. Could you elaborate a little more on > what it/sin't in the linker script that makes the difference? > I have no clue what linker magic is needed. re, wh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html