From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Subject: Re: sched_{set,get}attr() manpage Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 11:53:19 +0200 Message-ID: <53675F8F.3030107@gmail.com> References: <53020C9D.1050208@gmail.com> <20140428081858.GX13658@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <535FA467.2070403@gmail.com> <20140429160441.GU11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <5360D9E5.9080206@gmail.com> <20140430130937.GH30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140503124355.5d927080518051ca507bc381@gmail.com> <536735E0.7020204@gmail.com> <20140505072114.GY11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <53674094.2020307@gmail.com> <20140505074736.GZ11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140505074736.GZ11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, Juri Lelli , Dario Faggioli , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , rostedt@goodmis.org, Oleg Nesterov , fweisbec@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, johan.eker@ericsson.com, p.faure@akatech.ch, Linux Kernel , claudio@evidence.eu.com, michael@amarulasolutions.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it, nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it, luca.abeni@unitn.it, dhaval.giani@gmail.com, hgu1972@gmail.com, Paul McKenney , insop.song@gmail.com, liming.wang@windriver.com, jkacur@redhat.com, linux-man@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org On 05/05/2014 09:47 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 09:41:08AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >>>> But, in that case, I need to know the >>>> copyright and license you want to use. Please see >>>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/licenses.html >>> >>> GPLv2 + DOC (not v2+) sounds good. >> >> I'm a little unclear here. Do you or don't you mean >> https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/licenses.html#gpl >> ? > > A variant with out the +, just like I do my kernel code, no greater gpl > versions. However, > >> (Note, I'd really prefer to stick to one of those licenses >> (without variants). (My personal preference is the "verbatim" >> license, which is the most widely used one.) There's already >> do many licenses in in man-pages... > > Verbatim is OK with me I suppose. And don't neglect to mention who the copyright is to please. > Its only text after all, who cares > about that :-) > /me runs for the hills. Well, apparently you care, so thanks ;-) -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/