From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Borkmann Subject: Re: [PATCH man v3] bpf.2: various updates/follow-ups to address some fixmes Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 09:27:30 +0200 Message-ID: <55B88062.6090505@iogearbox.net> References: <86038f69cd3d753350b9947b675365fb7fe9da60.1438114491.git.daniel@iogearbox.net> <20150729055811.GH21252@vapier> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150729055811.GH21252@vapier> Sender: linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: vapier-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org Cc: mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, ast-uqk4Ao+rVK5Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org On 07/29/2015 07:58 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 28 Jul 2015 22:25, Daniel Borkmann wrote: >> -.BR bpf () >> +.BR bpf (2) > > i thought the style for man pages was to not include the section number for the > function you're currently documenting. since this is already the bpf(2) page, > it should use "bpf()" and not "bpf(2)". other man pages though should use > "bpf(2)". Ok, I was not aware of that. This accounts for the entire man page? There are a couple of other spots using bpf(2), so I would fix them as well in v4. Thanks, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html