From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: wharms-fPG8STNUNVg@public.gmane.org
Cc: mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
Tom Gundersen <teg-B22kvLQNl6c@public.gmane.org>,
linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Unit of /proc/sys/kernel/random/poolsize
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 22:02:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56771752.90705@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56732173.20905-fPG8STNUNVg@public.gmane.org>
Hello Walter,
On 12/17/2015 09:56 PM, walter harms wrote:
>
>
> Am 17.12.2015 08:51, schrieb Michael Kerrisk (man-pages):
>> Hello Tom,
>>
>> On 10/22/2011 02:13 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This might not be so much a bug report, as a request for clarification.
>>>
>>> In random(4) it is explained that /proc/sys/kernel/random/poolsize
>>> contains the value in bits or bytes in >=2.6 and 2.4 respectively.
>>> However, the example in the preceding paragraph assumes a 2.4 kernel
>>> is being used, and treats the value as if it were in bytes.
>>>
>>> I ran across this as I maintain the initscripts for Arch Linux, where
>>> we have been (mistakenly) following the example even though we use a
>>> 3.0 kernel. Maybe it would be worthwhile to change the example into
>>> the 2.6 interface, or at least include a word of caution?
>>>
>>> I realise that using a value which is too large, probably does no harm
>>> at all, but not being cryptography expert, I'd rather not take the
>>> chance.
>>
>> Long after the fact... I applied the patch below.
>> Okay?
>>
>> Thanks for the report.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> PS I am going to be in Oslo a couple of times in coming months.
>> Perhaps we could meet up for a beer or so.
>>
>> diff --git a/man4/random.4 b/man4/random.4
>> index 2519981..4a32aac 100644
>> --- a/man4/random.4
>> +++ b/man4/random.4
>> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ This reduces the actual amount of noise in the entropy pool
>> below the estimate.
>> In order to counteract this effect, it helps to carry
>> entropy pool information across shut-downs and start-ups.
>> -To do this, add the following lines to an appropriate script
>> +To do this, add the lines to an appropriate script
>> which is run during the Linux system start-up sequence:
>>
>> .nf
>> @@ -186,7 +186,8 @@ which is run during the Linux system start-up sequence:
>> fi
>> chmod 600 $random_seed
>> poolfile=/proc/sys/kernel/random/poolsize
>> - [ \-r $poolfile ] && bytes=\`cat $poolfile\` || bytes=512
>> + [ \-r $poolfile ] && bits=\`cat $poolfile\` || bits=4096
>
> I believe it was end of the 80's when $( ) was introduced to replace \`
> Since this example is for 2.6 maybe it would be useful to use it and
> improve readability ?
Yes, of course, and especially so since I use the modern syntax in the
new piece that I added. Fixed. Thanks for catching the obvious point
that I missed!
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-20 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-22 12:13 Unit of /proc/sys/kernel/random/poolsize Tom Gundersen
[not found] ` <CAG-2HqXo9GqNmiSt2npnBwx+F9_03eUTcxujgt_vNmdGhX8i6A-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-12-17 7:51 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
[not found] ` <5672699D.5010803-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-12-17 20:56 ` walter harms
[not found] ` <56732173.20905-fPG8STNUNVg@public.gmane.org>
2015-12-20 21:02 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56771752.90705@gmail.com \
--to=mtk.manpages-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=teg-B22kvLQNl6c@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wharms-fPG8STNUNVg@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).