From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Szabolcs Nagy Subject: Re: [patch] getauxval.3 correct AT_HWCAP result description Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 09:13:41 +0100 Message-ID: <5785F835.4070209@arm.com> References: <397D95928DECEF49983F5B237627E9785733058A@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <2b181d0f-3a50-bf18-268b-9991de75d216@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <2b181d0f-3a50-bf18-268b-9991de75d216@gmail.com> To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" , "Cownie, James H" Cc: nd@arm.com, "libc-alpha@sourceware.org" , "linux-man@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org On 12/07/16 21:24, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >> .BR AT_HWCAP >> -A pointer to a multibyte mask of bits whose settings >> +A four byte long bit-mask whose settings >> indicate detailed processor capabilities. why is it four byte long? it's a long and the target abi decides how many bits of that is used.