public inbox for linux-man@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)" <alx.manpages@gmail.com>
To: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
	Ivan Zuboff <anotherdiskmag@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org, mtk.manpages@gmail.com
Subject: Re: SA_ONSTACK: man page and glibc reference manual in conflict
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 22:23:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5cfb23b8-de77-3eec-92d0-da29fededf4c@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL-cVegvPvu6kZgn5x=6gimzuSTfCErKzTL+8+1UgQxM3fiNQQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi all,

On 1/31/22 10:29, Ivan Zuboff wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> Man page says:
> SA_ONSTACK
>               Call the signal handler on an alternate signal stack
>               provided by sigaltstack(2).  *If an alternate stack is not
>               available, the default stack will be used.*  This flag is
>               meaningful only when establishing a signal handler.
> https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/sigaction.2.html
> 
> glibc reference manual says:
> Macro: int SA_ONSTACK
> If this flag is set for a particular signal number, the system uses
> the signal stack when delivering that kind of signal. See Signal
> Stack. *If a signal with this flag arrives and you have not set a
> signal stack, the system terminates the program with SIGILL.*
> https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Flags-for-Sigaction.html
> 
> As far as I understand, statements in *stars* are in conflict. glibc
> documentation says that "While the glibc manual remains the canonical
> source for API descriptions, the man-pages are an excellent
> reference.", so I decided to mail you supposing that man page is
> incorrect in this regard.
> https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/documentation.html
> 
> Please correct me if I'm wrong. Also, sorry for my bad English, this
> is not my native language.
> 
> Best regards,
> Ivan

I received this bug report on linux-man@.  The report is about a text
that predates git in the man-pages.  Could you please confirm the bug,
and check if anything else needs to be fixed too?

Thanks,

Alex

Ivan:  Thanks for the report!  In non-trivial cases such as this one,
it's useful to CC the glibc mailing list, since they probably know more
than I about details such as this one. ;)

Cheers,

Alex

-- 
Alejandro Colomar
Linux man-pages comaintainer; https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-31 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-31  9:29 SA_ONSTACK: man page and glibc reference manual in conflict Ivan Zuboff
2022-01-31 21:23 ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) [this message]
2022-01-31 21:53   ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5cfb23b8-de77-3eec-92d0-da29fededf4c@gmail.com \
    --to=alx.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=anotherdiskmag@gmail.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox