From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E54C6FD1D for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2023 01:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232695AbjDEByI (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2023 21:54:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60338 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236228AbjDEByH (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2023 21:54:07 -0400 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07B543A8C for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 18:54:05 -0700 (PDT) References: <6c5593f5-efc0-564d-83fa-430328b31231@gmail.com> <5858fd32-aced-7f87-a1c2-2b92c002e4d3@gmail.com> <0219f97b-f28e-18f0-3451-87ee00f851aa@gmail.com> <6409b7ad-8b17-c2c4-9671-7c251cb93471@gmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.1; emacs 29.0.60 From: Sam James To: Alejandro Colomar Cc: Mingye Wang , linux-man@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] feature_test_macros.7: document clang fortify support Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2023 02:53:33 +0100 In-reply-to: <6409b7ad-8b17-c2c4-9671-7c251cb93471@gmail.com> Message-ID: <87edozqekm.fsf@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alejandro Colomar writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > Hi Mingye, > > On 4/3/23 18:24, Mingye Wang wrote: >> Hi Alex, >>=20 >> On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 5:56=E2=80=AFAM Alejandro Colomar wrote: >>> If it's just a reference to the software, that is fine. If it's a >>> reference to the version, then I want it to be greppable. >>> >>=20 >> Is my patch attached to the last message all good, or is there >> anything more to do? > > Sorry about the delay; I'm a bit overloaded. Did you check Sam's > objection? I'm happy now after a clarification was made (libssp does more than I thoug= ht it did). > > On 3/23/23 06:38, Sam James wrote: >> The patch looks OK to me in terms of the content, apart from the libssp >> mention. libssp and stack smashing protection overall is distinct from >> fortification. >>=20 >> SSP is where stack canaries are emitted and their value is checked >> later on to see if they're intact. Fortification is where certain >> functions are replaced with variants that check the size of their >> arguments e.g. dst & src and ensure they're big enough. They're distinct. > > Thanks, > Alex > >>=20 >> Thanks, >> Mingye --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iOUEARYKAI0WIQQlpruI3Zt2TGtVQcJzhAn1IN+RkAUCZCzUul8UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MjVB NkJCODhERDlCNzY0QzZCNTU0MUMyNzM4NDA5RjUyMERGOTE5MA8cc2FtQGdlbnRv by5vcmcACgkQc4QJ9SDfkZCoVgEAlH0FEegkNLnPEU01ZMKLUKzTikK2KKqVb04K UP/SJRgA/imZYsf/U0DbpCCGQDvS6GahrfnLFiSltbwavYt4xUQP =fTdz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--