From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F79C4363D for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 11:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16B2206FA for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 11:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="ErsDOKuD" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726029AbgJBLrL (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2020 07:47:11 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:22316 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725964AbgJBLrL (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2020 07:47:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601639230; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=y/+dbE6ZampEEgVyWbjL31CdhUsxU3p9CprgCAkzhXs=; b=ErsDOKuDS1AtKkNiVORMX1vYDigoRaAlEpV6P3pJs90iIwjcbrNGlOD/IVfVQ7pjr+Mp8C 3OdhRy6Mb+6l75HGu5orT2K3BLPNUHSM8Qy1UsbRiALqV/J35RumtbjLZ7AKkhi7RJRSOm vQ2PgPaRbjzf/Vd8eYZvXxzAaRJyLXw= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-221-6k_-FgFqO1ubPJeJeU-b4Q-1; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 07:47:08 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 6k_-FgFqO1ubPJeJeU-b4Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3E881084C98; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 11:47:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg2.str.redhat.com (ovpn-114-84.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.84]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 814B319C66; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 11:47:05 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, Alejandro Colomar , linux-man@vger.kernel.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] system_data_types.7: Add '__int128' References: <20201001163443.106933-1-colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com> <20201001163443.106933-2-colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 13:47:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20201001163443.106933-2-colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com> (Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha's message of "Thu, 1 Oct 2020 18:34:41 +0200") Message-ID: <87eemg97ew.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org * Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha: > +the compiler is able to generate efficient code for 128-bit arithmetic". Stray "? > +.PP > +See also the > +.IR intmax_t , > +.IR int N _t I think it's surprising that intmax_t can be smaller than __int128 (and usually is, I think), so that's probably worth mentioning. Assuming that we want to document __int128 at all as part of the man-pages project. Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill