From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22C1C1DC19E for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731883833; cv=none; b=tENfjPJK/mjYQCyN+2gsK7GhZ1fKT9CrMEY7rb3U6j8hwltvCit4RhImD9qItP1BgJHmvFWgrFRyWAT6+0nyBjsed2CGbiSQEXJE+u7o6r2YuofyQwEwpvSyGyImlMIoIImZlvkvdHWvdNkUjJw29mlSQkS65b6cPDssR6/5itY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731883833; c=relaxed/simple; bh=twYjd19fJUOt6uQSR/7HlGc86hpEexaNi79U+4KFt5c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VNecFLUcnqyvF9WWX2W8PJ+NLsCbxm6X4RIHPlglp9JS+oeL2Zig1DfhM9hmMaqhOXkNBr937oZ/wnWtGBakuB4VgB1hC7tQP9KpRjnOF4oqEYHLrJefx9PYgi8oJGmUVkk1hSVQR+uZlim4QQcD8GjbPYvvqEzjdVhZpkz8eUY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Q0BGs/3I; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Q0BGs/3I" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1731883831; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=74l4NvVYhjboh9jnk2OFce3mU1koMYGUm/jqQDF1bNw=; b=Q0BGs/3IGWtAY58dOdha3/nHDCXJfUQj+33FTOCIYidqnpBaQS/lxNrrFzmmzfIw6/k7bV 3AqWG/6JLbnlWEhZltM81awS6e2zEL9zi5ApfJUSkGOXhoBTrH+z8OHTnK0aJvhwwoQFWQ zT92hUoMGu9Cpn5tNdi1SPR7ym7G4dg= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-64-25FBtd9cMk2iBEyO1EFqvw-1; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:50:25 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 25FBtd9cMk2iBEyO1EFqvw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 25FBtd9cMk2iBEyO1EFqvw Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13CF419560AA; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:50:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.74]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DEEB1955F43; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:50:21 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Alejandro Colomar Cc: Helge Kreutzmann , mario.blaettermann@gmail.com, linux-man@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Issue in man page sprof.1 In-Reply-To: (Alejandro Colomar's message of "Sun, 17 Nov 2024 12:55:36 +0100") References: Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 23:50:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87mshxxyol.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 * Alejandro Colomar: > Hi Helge, > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 10:46:23AM GMT, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: >> Without further ado, the following was found: >> >> Issue: Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-open.c: 930: _dl_open: Assertion `_dl_debug_update (args.nsid)->r_state == RT_CONSISTENT' failed! > > IIUC, this report is that running the example shell session resulted in > that problem. I've CCed glibc in case they can help. > > It would be interesting to know if this can be reproduced, and a full > reproducer. Hasn't this been fixed in glibc 2.38? Via: commit ab5aa2ee3d3f978e474803cbbc5fe805ad30e293 Author: Andreas Schwab Date: Thu Mar 23 16:46:20 2023 +0100 dlopen: skip debugger notification for DSO loaded from sprof (bug 30258) Avoid inconsistent state in the debugger interface. Thanks, Florian