From: Rasmus Villemoes <rv-qQsb+v5E8BnlAoU/VqSP6n9LOBIZ5rWg@public.gmane.org>
To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)"
<mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] check_protypes.pl: semi-automatic consistency checks
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 11:09:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ppj689i3.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <537D9B87.1070200-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> (Michael Kerrisk's message of "Thu, 22 May 2014 08:39:03 +0200")
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:
> A question (which you may or may not be interested in ;-)):
> How feasible do you think it would be to write a script that
> tells me the FTM requirements for a given API?
Parsing the glibc headers is probably out of the question, also because of:
> (Note that the answer will very across glibc versions, so such a
> script would need as input both header files and and some
> glibc-version-specific table mapping the __USE internal macros back to
> FTM settings.
So I would probably let gcc do the work, using a sort of "binary-search"
over the possible combinations of FTMs (complicated by the various FTMs
not providing a linearly increasing set of features, but rather a weird
tree of mutual implications). Something like
(1) create foo.c file containing nothing but #include of the header(s) we
think are necessary
(2) compile with gcc -D_GNU_SOURCE -aux-info foo.aux -o /dev/null -c
foo.c
(3) check that the function we want is actually listed in the .aux file
(these are very easy to parse). If not, we (a) need more/other
headers, (b) have a too old glibc installed and/or (c) need more FTMs,
such as _ISOC11_SOURCE.
If the function is exposed using _GNU_SOURCE, one can then repeat step
(2) with -D_GNU_SOURCE replaced by various combinations of the other
FTMs; at each step recording whether the function is exposed or
not. This should be scriptable, so one gets lots of yes/no data points.
But how one goes from these data points to something like (taken from
valloc(3))
_BSD_SOURCE ||
(_XOPEN_SOURCE >= 500 ||
_XOPEN_SOURCE && _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED) &&
!(_POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 200112L || _XOPEN_SOURCE >= 600)
I have no idea.
Rasmus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-22 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-20 0:00 [PATCH] check_protypes.pl: semi-automatic consistency checks Rasmus Villemoes
[not found] ` <1400544046-4503-1-git-send-email-rv-qQsb+v5E8BnlAoU/VqSP6n9LOBIZ5rWg@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-22 6:39 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
[not found] ` <537D9B87.1070200-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-22 9:09 ` Rasmus Villemoes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ppj689i3.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--to=rv-qqsb+v5e8bnlaou/vqsp6n9lobiz5rwg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox