Alejandro Colomar writes: > In HISTORY, I tend to not remove any details about versions. The glibc > version where it was introduced might be useful for someone, so let's > keep it. Other than that, LGTM. Thanks! I thought the same, but I based my patch on getline which was GNU before POSIX. It has: GNU, POSIX.1-2008. What would it be better to do: glibc 2.17, POSIX.1-2024 or should it be: GNU (glibc 2.17), POSIX.1-2024 I would check other examples, but my memory for other functions POSIX adopted from GNU isn't working well... Collin