public inbox for linux-man@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
To: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, linux-man@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] getcpu.2: Document glibc wrapper instead of kernel syscall
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 09:41:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a4fecc5-be0a-99a9-a101-ca956cdceaa8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201230214147.874671-6-alx.manpages@gmail.com>

Hi Alex,

On 12/30/20 10:41 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> The glibc wrapper doesn't provide the third argument.
> Simplify the info about the (unused) kernel parameter
> to the minimum that is useful.
> 
> kernels <=2.6.23 are EOL since a long time ago.
> 
> The old info is commented out instead of removed.

I tend to be rather conservative about preserving historical
detail in the manual pages. Yes, 2.6.23 may be EOL from the
kernel community's point of view, but even in quite recent
times I've run into folk in the embedded world that who have
to at the very least support 2.6.* systems. So, as a general
principle, I'm inclined to retain the kind of info that this
patch removes. (I admit though that this is an extreme case:
historical behavior in a system call that is not frequently
used.)

There are exceptions. Occassionaly I run into historical 
info in manual pages that is clearly wrong, or incomplete.
In such cases, I am sometimes inclined to trim the details,
rather than invest the effort in working out all of the
historical details.

Clearly though, some fix is needed, since we now have 
a glibc wrapper that has just two arguments. I've applied
the patch below.

Cheers,

Michael

diff --git a/man2/getcpu.2 b/man2/getcpu.2
index a75123f97..59089bd74 100644
--- a/man2/getcpu.2
+++ b/man2/getcpu.2
@@ -14,10 +14,10 @@
 getcpu \- determine CPU and NUMA node on which the calling thread is running
 .SH SYNOPSIS
 .nf
-.B #include <linux/getcpu.h>
+.BR "#define _GNU_SOURCE" "             /* See feature_test_macros(7) */"
+.B #include <sched.h>
 .PP
-.BI "int getcpu(unsigned int *" cpu ", unsigned int *" node \
-", struct getcpu_cache *" tcache );
+.BI "int getcpu(unsigned int *" cpu ", unsigned int *" node );
 .fi
 .SH DESCRIPTION
 The
@@ -37,10 +37,6 @@ or
 .I node
 is NULL nothing is written to the respective pointer.
 .PP
-The third argument to this system call is nowadays unused,
-and should be specified as NULL
-unless portability to Linux 2.6.23 or earlier is required (see NOTES).
-.PP
 The information placed in
 .I cpu
 is guaranteed to be current only at the time of the call:
@@ -82,16 +78,31 @@ The intention of
 .BR getcpu ()
 is to allow programs to make optimizations with per-CPU data
 or for NUMA optimization.
+.\"
+.SS C library/kernel differences
+The kernel system call has a third argument:
+.PP
+.in +4n
+.nf
+.BI "int getcpu(unsigned int *" cpu ", unsigned int *" node ,
+.BI "           struct getcpu_cache *" tcache );
+.fi
+.in
 .PP
 The
 .I tcache
-argument is unused since Linux 2.6.24.
+argument is unused since Linux 2.6.24,
+and (when invoking the system call directly)
+should be specified as NULL,
+unless portability to Linux 2.6.23 or earlier is required.
+.PP
 .\" commit 4307d1e5ada595c87f9a4d16db16ba5edb70dcb1
 .\" Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
 .\" Date:   Wed Nov 7 18:37:48 2007 +0100
 .\" x86: ignore the sys_getcpu() tcache parameter
-In earlier kernels,
-if this argument was non-NULL,
+In Linux 2.6.23 and earlier, if the
+.I tcache
+argument was non-NULL,
 then it specified a pointer to a caller-allocated buffer in thread-local
 storage that was used to provide a caching mechanism for
 .BR getcpu ().

-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-02  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-30 21:41 [PATCH] getcpu.2: Document glibc wrapper instead of kernel syscall Alejandro Colomar
2021-01-02  8:41 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) [this message]
2021-01-02 17:22   ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9a4fecc5-be0a-99a9-a101-ca956cdceaa8@gmail.com \
    --to=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=alx.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox