linux-man.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
	linux-man <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>,
	alexandermv@gmail.com,
	Matthew Bobrowski <mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel bugzilla 198569: fanotify_mark() and FAN_Q_OVERFLOW
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 19:42:33 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxhGMLKHBLjr_1k-C0JBPOoRvwSYmfonyd9ks0m0Fn8j2Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgNAki3BwX3_oSQ158T=6+5uRwsBKrNkz=aaF-2_d933PZCBA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 3:42 PM Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
<mtk.manpages@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Amir, Jan,
>
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 14:19, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 2:23 PM Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Michael!
> > >
> > > On Thu 23-04-20 12:36:26, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > > > Would you be able to take a look at
> > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198569
> > > >
> > > > It relates to some text you added to the fanotify_mark(2) manual page:
> > > >
> > > >        FAN_Q_OVERFLOW
> > > >               Create an event when an overflow of the event queue occurs.
> > > >               The size of the event queue is limited to 16384 entries  if
> > > >               FAN_UNLIMITED_QUEUE is not set in fanotify_init(2).
> > > >
> > > > This was in the following commit
> > > >
> > > > [[
> > > > commit 5d730f864a6603b090cd1078668cede05d02b8c4
> > > > Author: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
> > > > Date:   Tue Nov 8 23:13:38 2016 +0100
> > > >
> > > >     fanotify_mark.2: Mention FAN_Q_OVERFLOW
> > > >
> > > >     To receive overflow events it is necessary to set this bit
> > > >     in fanotify_mark().
> > > > ]]
> > > >
> > > > As far as I can see, FAN_Q_OVERFLOW (test program, reading the kernel
> > > > source) is only an output flag. But on the other hand, I know you are
> > > > generally careful, so I wonder if something changed (though, at a
> > > > quick glance, I could not see evidence that it has).
> > >
> > > Yeah, the manpage is wrong AFAICT. FAN_Q_OVERFLOW is not accepted in the
> > > input mask. It is only output event flag.
> > >
> >
> > Right.
> >
> > Note that fanotify.7 documents FAN_Q_OVERFLOW as part of event output mask
> > so perhaps the FAN_Q_OVERFLOW entry for fanotify_mark.2 input mask should
> > just be removed?
>
> Yes, I'll just remove that piece from fanotify_mark.2.
> >
> > Similarly, the input only flag FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD is documented in
> > fanotify_mark.2, but not in fanotify.7.
> >
> > FAN_ONDIR has been input only until v5.1 and since then it can also be
> > in output mask for group with FAN_REPORT_FID.
> > This is documented in fanotify_mark.2, but not in fanotify.7.
>
> I'm overlooking something: where is this detail documented in
> fanotify_mark.2? (I mean, I see mention of FAN_ONDIR, but no mention
> of a change in v5.1.)

fanotify_mark.2:
The FAN_ONDIR flag is reported in an event mask only if the fanotify_fd
file descriptor has been initialized with the flag FAN_REPORT_FID.

fanotify_init.2:
FAN_REPORT_FID (since Linux 5.1)

>
> And would you be willing to write a small patch for fanotify.7 :-) ?
>

I guess I was asking for it ;-)
I have some more work cut out for me on this man page for v5.7 or later.
Adding yet another fanotify_init flag, so I'll make this change part of my
next series.

Thanks,
Amir.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-23 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-23 10:36 Kernel bugzilla 198569: fanotify_mark() and FAN_Q_OVERFLOW Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-04-23 11:23 ` Jan Kara
2020-04-23 12:19   ` Amir Goldstein
2020-04-23 12:42     ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-04-23 16:42       ` Amir Goldstein [this message]
2020-05-15 11:44         ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOQ4uxhGMLKHBLjr_1k-C0JBPOoRvwSYmfonyd9ks0m0Fn8j2Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexandermv@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).