From: "Günther Noack" <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
To: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
Cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@gmail.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] landlock.7: Document Landlock ABI v2 (file reparenting; kernel 5.19)
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 09:39:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y/cmUt8XtTU6pm0P@galopp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ae071c4a4da0204d3921478797e41b1a@mail.infomaniak.com>
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 08:01:31AM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> I think this table is useful, but it should contain a warning to make sure developers don't rely on kernel versions to check Landlock features, but use the dedicated Landlock syscall instead.
> It should be explained that this table is true for the mainline/vanilla kernel, but that can be incorrect for any other kernel (e.g. patched distro kernel, like chromeOS that may backport upstream features).
Thanks, that's a good point. I'll add that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-23 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-21 20:50 [PATCH 1/3] landlock.7: Move the warning about missing features into the CAVEATS section Günther Noack
2023-02-21 20:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] landlock.7: Document Landlock ABI v2 (file reparenting; kernel 5.19) Günther Noack
2023-02-22 7:01 ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-02-23 8:39 ` Günther Noack [this message]
2023-02-22 7:36 ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-02-23 8:48 ` Günther Noack
2023-02-25 1:10 ` Alex Colomar
2023-02-25 1:19 ` G. Branden Robinson
2023-02-25 1:29 ` Alex Colomar
2023-02-28 19:46 ` Günther Noack
2023-02-25 1:06 ` Alex Colomar
2023-02-22 7:45 ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-02-23 9:18 ` Günther Noack
2023-02-24 23:21 ` Alex Colomar
2023-02-28 20:21 ` Günther Noack
2023-02-21 20:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] landlock.7: Document Landlock ABI v3 (file truncation; kernel 6.2) Günther Noack
2023-02-22 8:04 ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-02-23 9:24 ` Günther Noack
2023-02-24 23:31 ` Alex Colomar
2023-02-28 20:29 ` Günther Noack
2023-02-24 23:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] landlock.7: Move the warning about missing features into the CAVEATS section Alex Colomar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y/cmUt8XtTU6pm0P@galopp \
--to=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
--cc=alx.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox