Re: [PATCH v11] sgx.7: New page with overview of Software Guard eXtensions (SGX)

Alejandro Colomar
2023-03-30T22:29:23Z

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1664 bytes --]

Hi Jarkko,

I was revisiting old mails, and found this thread that seems unresolved.
Do you still have the page around and want to send it?

Cheers,

Alex

On 2/20/22 21:05, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 09:19:54PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
>> Hi Jarkko,
>>
>> On 1/28/22 02:19, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 02:50:56AM +0100, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
>>>> Hi Jarkko,
>>>>
>>>> Please see some comments below.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Alex
>>>
>>> Thank you. I've addressed all the comments below. However, I feel that
>>> /dev/sgx_provision is not properly documented at all. I also think that
>>> Reinette's argument for v10 was fair that "remove VEPC" ioctl that QEMU
>>> uses should not be left out from the initial patch set.
>>>
>>> I'm implementing user space that doest attestation, so I rather write a
>>> proper description of the attestation, once it is working, rather than add
>>> to the number of review rounds.
>>
>> Fair enough. Please send an v12 with those comments addressed, and I'll
>> merge it! (if you miss anything, we'll fix it later, don't worry)
>
> It took me two weeks to do the remote attestation implementation for Enarx
> project [*] but I needed to do it before continuing with the man page. I'll
> continue with this some time next week. It's not exactly directly attached
> to kernel API but I think it is good to bring some context on that.
>
> [*] https://github.com/enarx/enarx/pull/1329
>
> BR, Jarkko

--
<http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]