Re: man -M tcl (was: All caps .TH page title)

Alejandro Colomar
2022-07-29T13:28:04Z

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1062 bytes --]

On 7/29/22 15:22, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> What are your thoughts?
>
> Yes, even though /usr/local/share/doc/pkgname/man/man* is a bit long,
> it makes more sense than paths like
>
> /usr/local/cyrus/man/
> /usr/local/heirloom-doctools/man/
> /usr/local/lib/erlang21/man/
> /usr/local/lib/node_modules/npm/man/
> /usr/local/lib/stk/4.0.1/man/
> /usr/local/lib/tcl/tcl8.6/man/
> /usr/local/plan9/man/
> /usr/local/share/fish/man/
>
> Then again, *if* we go the -M alias way, these paths are only
> ever used in the man.conf(5) file. So where exactly they are
> has no major impact on the user and is more a matter of system
> cleanliness.

Yeah, I do want to have system cleanliness, especially to help
programmers organizing their file hierarchy know where they should put
things.

So, let it be </usr/local/share/doc/pkgname/man/man*>.

I'll have a look at the POSIX man pages and see if there's something I
can do there.

Thanks,

Alex

--
Alejandro Colomar
<http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]