public inbox for linux-man@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
To: "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org, groff@gnu.org
Subject: Re: `\c`, mdoc(7), and man(7) extension macros (was: [PATCH 1/2] man*/: srcfix)
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 18:30:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZT03FcWI7V5iQIon@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231028132159.zkf6fh34mmfjzu37@illithid>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 976 bytes --]

Hi Branden,

On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 08:21:59AM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Regarding PP, LP, and P, what's the history of them?  Why do we have
> > the 3?  I'm willing to reduce them to just one.
> 
> We covered this in another thread, but as Ingo noted, there is no hope
> of actually _retiring_ any of these.  At most they can be documentarily
> deprecated and a high "-rCHECKSTYLE" setting can gripe about them.

Makes sense.

> 
> groff man(7) formats every Seventh Edition Unix (1979) man page
> correctly as far as I can tell, and I don't want to ever give that up.
> 
> (This is a slightly different objective from preserving perfect
> compatibility with 7th edition's tmac.an.  I have no qualms about
> discarding compatibility with details of macro package behavior that no
> one relied upon for practical purposes.)

This gives me hope in changing the behavior of RS.  :P

Cheers,
Alex

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-28 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-25 18:54 [PATCH 1/2] man*/: srcfix G. Branden Robinson
2023-10-25 19:38 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-26 12:58   ` `\c`, mdoc(7), and man(7) extension macros (was: [PATCH 1/2] man*/: srcfix) G. Branden Robinson
2023-10-26 14:12     ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-26 14:51       ` Why does man(7) have 3 paragraph macros for the same thing? (was: `\c`, mdoc(7), and man(7) extension macros) G. Branden Robinson
2023-10-26 14:58         ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-26 15:28           ` G. Branden Robinson
2023-10-26 17:52             ` Why does man(7) have 3 paragraph macros for the same thing? Ingo Schwarze
2023-10-26 22:16               ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-26 22:02             ` Why does man(7) have 3 paragraph macros for the same thing? (was: `\c`, mdoc(7), and man(7) extension macros) Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-26 16:09         ` G. Branden Robinson
2023-10-26 21:59           ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-28 13:21       ` `\c`, mdoc(7), and man(7) extension macros (was: [PATCH 1/2] man*/: srcfix) G. Branden Robinson
2023-10-28 16:30         ` Alejandro Colomar [this message]
2023-10-26 23:27     ` Ingo Schwarze
2023-10-27  0:51       ` Alejandro Colomar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZT03FcWI7V5iQIon@debian \
    --to=alx@kernel.org \
    --cc=g.branden.robinson@gmail.com \
    --cc=groff@gnu.org \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox