public inbox for linux-man@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
To: Stefan Puiu <stefan.puiu@gmail.com>
Cc: Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
	linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ld.so.8: Describe glibc Hardware capabilities
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 11:43:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTeRx4vqHQ07eATQ@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACKs7VBdNpWL6-GsECk46s7rK+aDiSr5BjROFL-T_Mh2AvPQ9Q@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 896 bytes --]

Hi Stefan,

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:59:12AM +0300, Stefan Puiu wrote:
[...]

> > >> Signed-off-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
> > >> ---
> > >>  man8/ld.so.8 | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >>  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
[...]
> 
> >   .PP
> >   For instance, on x86 64-bit, if the hardware supports
> >   .B x86_64-v3
> >   (for instance Intel Haswell or AMD Excavator)
> >   , the resulting search path will be
> >   .BR glibc-hwcaps/x86-64-v3:glibc-hwcaps/x86-64-v2:.
> 
> I think it would be useful if the existing levels are defined
> somewhere; maybe Alex can suggest the proper manpage.

I'm sorry; I didn't even know about these things until Adhemerval sent
the patch.  But yeah, I agree that if would be good to define them.  :)

Cheers,
Alex

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-24  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-19 17:23 [PATCH v3] ld.so.8: Describe glibc Hardware capabilities Adhemerval Zanella
2023-10-19 19:10 ` Stefan Puiu
2023-10-20 17:49   ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2023-10-24  7:59     ` Stefan Puiu
2023-10-24  9:43       ` Alejandro Colomar [this message]
2023-10-24 10:00         ` Stefan Puiu
2023-10-24 10:53           ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-26 18:26       ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZTeRx4vqHQ07eATQ@debian \
    --to=alx@kernel.org \
    --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefan.puiu@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox