Re: Mail-Followup-To header (was: Order priority issues for special 3type sub-section)

Alejandro Colomar
2024-03-07T10:37:39Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1482 bytes --]

Hi Lennart,

On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 09:37:43AM +0000, Lennart Jablonka wrote:
> Quoth Alejandro Colomar:
> > I've found now why my MUAs don't include you in the reply. I've seen
> > the following header in your message. I don't know if this is something
> > you configured your MUA to send, or if it's an accident. Please have a
> > look.
> >
> > Mail-Followup-To: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>,
> > Guillem Jover <guillem@hadrons.org>, linux-man@vger.kernel.org
>
> The Mail-Followup-To header field is good and useful. And Mutt, for
> example, sends it by default, if you’re properly using `lists` and
> `subscribe`. “I’m subscribed to this list anyway, so you need not send
> followups to me separately as well.”

Hmm, it's interesting. It messes with what's To and what's Cc, but it's
better than just replying to the list, which I hate because you never
know who's subscribed to it (e.g., most people in the groff@ mailing
list don't send me a copy of their responses, and I'm not subscribed to
the list; or in other lists, even if I'm subscribed to the list, I won't
read most stuff unless either the subject looks interesting or I'm To or
Cc).

> More people should use and honor it.

While I'll keep not using it, I'll honor it, now I understand it. :)

> /me unignores mail-followup-to

Have a lovely day!