Hi Branden,

On Sat, Jan 10, 2026 at 05:52:28AM -0600, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> 
> At 2026-01-10T12:30:13+0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> [rearranged]
> > On Sat, Jan 10, 2026 at 07:57:49AM +0000, Seth McDonald wrote:
> > > I know that the void pointer type was not mentioned or used in
> > > POSIX.1-1988.  Instead, the standard used the char pointer type for
> > > pointers to generic data.  POSIX.1-1990 seems to implicitly require
> > > void pointers - at least for conformance to "POSIX.1, C Language
> > > Binding (C Standard Language-Dependent System Support)" - by
> > > including them in some function prototypes.
> > 
> > > On Friday, 9 January 2026 at 20:34, Alejandro Colomar
> > > <alx@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Hmmm, since POSIX.1-1988 was already written after some C89 draft, it
> > seems void* was incorporated to C89 in a late draft.
> [...]
> > Yup, K&R C 1st ed. is too old and I wouldn't expect it to have
> > void*.  I have a physical copy of K&R C 2nd ed. (1988) and it does
> > have void*.
> [...]
> > Being a scan [of 1e], it could be authentic.  I don't have a physical
> > copy of the first edition, so can't compare.
> [...]
> > If anyone else reading the list knows anything, it would be welcome.
> > 
> > Be careful of online copies of K&R C, though.  I once found one of the
> > second edition, and it was fake (by comparing it to the actual copy).
> > 
> > Much better to get the physical copy.  Although the first edition seems
> > difficult to find.
> 
> I have a physical copy of K&R 1e, but unfortunately it is in storage and
> not easy to access.  However...
> 
> I have before me as I type this a copy of Tom Plum's _Notes on the Draft
> C Standard_, copyright 1987 (Plum Hall, ISBN 609-927-3770).  Publishers
> treat years in copyright notices the way automakers treat them in
> vehicle models, so I'd guess this puts the date of publication anywhere
> from 4Q1986 to 3Q1987.
> 
> In Chapter 2, "Comparison with Earlier C", on p. 24, it says:
> 
> 	"A pointer to any object type may be converted to a ‘‘generic’’
> 	pointer and back again without change.  The syntax for generic
> 	pointer is void *."
> 
> Tom Plum was a noteworthy figure in C standardization circles; his name
> shows up in much literature on the subject.  I'd regard him as an
> authority.

Thanks!

I've now checked the rationale for C89, and it says that

	Several new types have been added:

And mentions 'void', 'void*', and 'signed char'.  It seems it was an
invention of C89.


Hve a lovely day!
Alex

> 
> https://plumhall.com/newsite/phall.html
> 
> Looks like he passed away last year.  :(
> 
> Regards,
> Branden



-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>