From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-24416.protonmail.ch (mail-24416.protonmail.ch [109.224.244.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D2D22EBDFD for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=109.224.244.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769041991; cv=none; b=O+WU1kAlsss+gBnOpD12blZC2EB+zrey0Xg0iGc+6AHU8ax1nnpdHzKMyfwHQ79Y5aJurMuDTLDyV4Q90y+9HxjhmYRH5wigMyNJd/Mh5oI3nCbVDTmb2Cpz2nJEaFxuMXiSgOp5ljeMVWAOFlwIFk/BGX/ZT8yzdJIcPtVjxd8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769041991; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YTVXhEMSXToY+j81WF01kUZdu6dgsY7u0sreUW7zgzY=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GxgsL+k66q6TQLLGPSMzCCaeM8zarwUlopJidUoBZmuXdcVcto1yi2oRR03Lf8x4eFBBnvyk029LDDCWsEbLOC4IExuddhL8qwAFb+H7ps+LZiWfL77mPjxh80ED8I/E4ghbaT5npS3z6kOt5M/ZsEd/TG68q/Kr8xVVSUZRWk4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=pm.me; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pm.me; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pm.me header.i=@pm.me header.b=ACGGS9HE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=109.224.244.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=pm.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pm.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pm.me header.i=@pm.me header.b="ACGGS9HE" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pm.me; s=protonmail3; t=1769041981; x=1769301181; bh=+H71DVfSz2GgZJEAKhnKNM7K5k7y0hOAeAjB38NO9F4=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=ACGGS9HEm0bZ6lYBVkBVY1MfJtGSUN/KgCsOto8FX6JR7IuksIcN4WfVAOsYCukqj +kJh6oP/BO6xQpH22izOIBmn6B94YyT35F0b8YF9nUGOHikdImc0crG50eLd94ZqYF BsP3ZfLRlRU2arA47yHMbGJnFhNxOWCCBk1zLuj1p+EbzRsNeMyWId10ZWAa+aeB3v P+h1X2khyiXUoHsEFZbtBK2Qvn/7e0M2cn77ebx5+vKuYxtqFPQY9Cs46BkbOgtEgi WbrS0yY99WZu8wX+YK49eCJDwp7V9YOf90QrTNMxLahRuTL8tdKJ61zdSWtClxcHs5 /RRyQDmZX/iGw== Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:32:55 +0000 To: Alejandro Colomar From: Seth McDonald Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/23] man/man2/clock_getres.2: HISTORY: Update first POSIX appearance of clock_* syscalls Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <1a421b5ee130c1d5892791060b6fdf8d911d8362.1768995315.git.sethmcmail@pm.me> Feedback-ID: 171233811:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 1aef1b23c1456fd133f53924e3c57fd6a449c720 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="------8af9fd52cd99215ff57dbca0a09a325ec0c89a42ec39e6fcf30afd20dd26ff16"; charset=utf-8 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------8af9fd52cd99215ff57dbca0a09a325ec0c89a42ec39e6fcf30afd20dd26ff16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 10:32:49 +1000 From: Seth McDonald To: Alejandro Colomar Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/23] man/man2/clock_getres.2: HISTORY: Update first POSIX appearance of clock_* syscalls Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Seth McDonald , Alejandro Colomar , linux-man@vger.kernel.org References: <1a421b5ee130c1d5892791060b6fdf8d911d8362.1768995315.git.sethmcmail@pm.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.13 (2024-03-09) Hi Alex, On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 04:49:25PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Hi Seth, > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 12:06:57PM +0000, Seth McDonald wrote: > > clock_getres(2), clock_gettime(2), and clock_settime(2) first appeared > > in POSIX.1-1996.[1] SUSv2 incorporates POSIX.1-1996, so listing both is > > redundant. > > Are you sure SUSv2 incorporates POSIX.1-1996? Could you please show > sources for that? We can reference the following SUSv2 PDF: CAE Specification, System Interfaces and Headers, Issue 5. Section 1.6 "Relationship to Formal Standards", page 11 states: Great care has been taken to ensure that this specification is fully aligned with the following formal standards: - ISO/IEC 9945-1:1996 - ISO/IEC 9945-2:1993 - ISO/IEC 9899:1990 - ISO/IEC 9899:1990/Amendment 1:1994 (E) (MSE) - Federal Information Procurement Standards (FIPS) 151-2. Any conflict between this specification and any of these standards is unintentional. Additionally, section 1.7 "Portability", page 12 states: This document describes a superset of the requirements of the ISO POSIX-1 standard and the ISO C standard. [...] (The ISO POSIX-1 standard is identical to IEEE Std 1003.1-1996, which is often referred to as the POSIX.1 standard. [...]) For context, page xiii defines "ISO C" as ISO/IEC 9899:1990 including Technical Corrigendum 1:1994 and Amendment 1:1994. And "ISO POSIX-1" as ISO/IEC 9945-1:1996. So SUSv2 XSH is a superset of POSIX.1-1996 and C95. -- Take care, Seth McDonald. On-list: 2336 E8D2 FEB1 5300 692C 62A9 5839 6AD8 9243 D369 Off-list: 82B9 620E 53D0 A1AE 2D69 6111 C267 B002 0A90 0289 --------8af9fd52cd99215ff57dbca0a09a325ec0c89a42ec39e6fcf30afd20dd26ff16 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: ProtonMail wqsEARYIAF0FgmlxcDYJkFg5atiSQ9NpNRQAAAAAABwAEHNhbHRAbm90YXRp b25zLm9wZW5wZ3Bqcy5vcmcs2kC95aKAVqTMGkiPCdhCFiEEIzbo0v6xUwBp LGKpWDlq2JJD02kAANwbAQC+ueMGQfNz1yReKgyyo0Jm4BqmZy+m3Ol0742b L/yIcgEA3tkYUmQXTIMbcHJyYH5D+vttKpNdJ03Ismk4Tg+CJwk= =QoJr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------8af9fd52cd99215ff57dbca0a09a325ec0c89a42ec39e6fcf30afd20dd26ff16--