From: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
To: Mark Harris <mark.hsj@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] man/man3/timespec_get.3: Refactor to prepare for new time bases
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 16:28:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXt76inr6vGh4lod@devuan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79f235d4b360689a290d525c36c3a06a36e5164a.1769619403.git.mark.hsj@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1273 bytes --]
Hi Mark,
On 2026-01-28T09:33:03-0800, Mark Harris wrote:
> Add Feature Test Macro Requirements to document functions and macros
> that require ISO C11 or C23, and arrange supported time bases as a list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Harris <mark.hsj@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: Split into two patches, add time bases to History section
>
> man/man3/timespec_get.3 | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
[...]
> @@ -78,18 +96,16 @@ .SH ATTRIBUTES
> .SH STANDARDS
> .TP
> .BR timespec_get ()
> -.TQ
> +C23 (though ISO C doesn't specify the
> .B TIME_UTC
> -C23 (though ISO C doesn't specify the time epoch),
> +epoch),
> POSIX.1-2024.
How about this?:
.TP
.BR timespec_get ()
C23, POSIX.1-2024.
.TQ
.B TIME_UTC
C23 (though ISO C doesn't specify the time epoch),
POSIX.1-2024.
> .TP
> .BR timespec_getres ()
> C23.
> .SH HISTORY
> .TP
> -.BR timespec_get ()
> -.TQ
> -.B TIME_UTC
> +.BR timespec_get "(), " TIME_UTC
I prefer the format with TQ. I wouldn't change anything in HISTORY.
Have a lovely day!
Alex
> C11, POSIX.1-2024, glibc 2.16, musl 1.1.10.
> .TP
> .BR timespec_getres ()
> --
> 2.52.0
>
--
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-29 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-28 6:42 [PATCH] man/man3/timespec_get.3: Add ISO C23 time bases Mark Harris
2026-01-28 14:57 ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-01-28 17:35 ` Mark Harris
2026-01-28 17:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] man/man3/timespec_get.3: Refactor to prepare for new " Mark Harris
2026-01-28 17:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] man/man3/timespec_get.3: Add ISO C23 " Mark Harris
2026-01-29 15:28 ` Alejandro Colomar [this message]
2026-01-29 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] man/man3/timespec_get.3: Refactor to prepare for new " Mark Harris
2026-01-29 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 " Mark Harris
2026-01-29 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] man/man3/timespec_get.3: Add ISO C23 " Mark Harris
2026-02-10 23:01 ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-02-10 22:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] man/man3/timespec_get.3: Refactor to prepare for new " Alejandro Colomar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXt76inr6vGh4lod@devuan \
--to=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.hsj@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox