From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02F4C388F9 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 14:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDB22072C for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 14:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="X7vPWL6h" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726207AbgKKOWd (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:22:33 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33322 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725912AbgKKOWd (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:22:33 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC361C0613D1 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 06:22:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id j7so2717679wrp.3 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 06:22:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:cc:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DvfbnbNmWMVS4qKu0/SIT8inQWqHytzCEd0fAn53S6s=; b=X7vPWL6hPQaUxKleHE29cCFK4Uzi4gEkHDOXjXtHxWIAbqe4gr/c0M+WmLDTOVok0m dURsLTVQUgpTaNeVz1ln1DwfBpqZXVSGX6g5pAjsIxdxi7gphjSZ0twwvulC1FWwzIM3 CeDn/jN+wx+2xT4SU4Z96nvs7rcdHeGhFOh/TULIbT8uWQpS1J+8UkSBp4flfEiPaPY3 6w1OoYxYnMJYnU/WB2c+vr67j03EOe5k3WeRPrrb4JTsTcf6Q8Ah2oke2DKxskTKv1qM d621ezOWOFBSy5cf+EJCrl+xQdtyQcCafaRw40KM74Pz43HCjkIayMkj8+RdfRhzh4F/ zBGQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DvfbnbNmWMVS4qKu0/SIT8inQWqHytzCEd0fAn53S6s=; b=W6ZWtZHP8h8YmqKsWmJBEhJxG1dAw9yeyjkVPlSCPrvaUPNCbPPJo+1TugQVZPv+1E 6Q7Yfx2BaUtkgFqYgOpI4NWQHnMLfGvoP56XkiwzwGCM5QDdkGniJcNa02yktSu7xTmT I+ZfSQ6E3/mClcp+TwP+SeblG1v0LtRJNUKXLziU0MQXZ4+YBO2I6WUT39xvfDOBqaRz 5qSjMhIo71llzdVlDILGjk4tnEXT03DrW/G7jjmgWfM+jAkQqB3Qu+iIxpQrO0cexlMw cqpyOS0ooRwFR7EWCofKTay1ehr21AC8oShW5Lt8IRk23l9M8z7N9hM+odrRSpnUiOXy L+Ng== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532y7dY2lWopkpT4leLGye3Fz45ejsDEwBJeqTGU7jO7TFh/HRQt BkuahIpRW5ZoRIgwcvKYHN8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxmMGFXRf3Dcymy3rnxLOkikMOb/LDqnj5Ol8LcjpzY3moe7sqVfpmpsas/S9RQWsWybc8dwg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f88c:: with SMTP id u12mr21656119wrp.209.1605104549400; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 06:22:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.143] ([170.253.51.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x6sm2895404wmc.48.2020.11.11.06.22.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 06:22:28 -0800 (PST) To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" , "G . Branden Robinson" Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org, colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com From: "Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)" Subject: .RS Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 15:22:27 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Hi, We already talked about something similar some time ago. I see [.RS 4] and [.RS +4n] used in the man pages. And there are also [.in +4n] and I think I've also seen [.in 4]. Is there any difference between [+4n] and a simple [4]? Which is the preferred one? And BTW, does [.RS] do anything different than [.in]? I guess the code implementing those macros is written somewhere. Where can I have a look at that code to see it myself? Thanks, Alex