Hi Günther,

On 2026-05-14T09:04:17+0200, Günther Noack wrote:
> Document the new LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_RESOLVE_UNIX filesystem access right,
> which controls lookups of pathname UNIX domain sockets.  Restricts both
> connect(2) and sendmsg(2) with an explicit recipient address to UNIX
> sockets created outside the Landlock domain (same semantics as
> LANDLOCK_SCOPE_* flags).  Denied attempts return EACCES.
> 
> Available since Linux 7.1 (Landlock ABI version 9).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
> ---
>  man/man7/landlock.7 | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/man/man7/landlock.7 b/man/man7/landlock.7
> index 0e3a11489af2..d0d9c720bfaf 100644
> --- a/man/man7/landlock.7
> +++ b/man/man7/landlock.7
> @@ -139,6 +139,38 @@ whose implementations are safe and return the right error codes
>  .RE
>  .IP
>  This access right is available since the fifth version of the Landlock ABI.
> +.TP
> +.B LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_RESOLVE_UNIX
> +Look up pathname UNIX
> +domain sockets
> +.RB ( unix (7)).
> +On UNIX domain sockets,
> +this restricts both calls to
> +.BR connect (2)
> +and
> +.BR sendmsg (2)
> +with an explicit recipient address.
> +.IP
> +This access right only applies to connections to UNIX server sockets

s/only applies/applies only/

> +which were created outside the newly created Landlock domain
> +(e.g., from within a parent domain or from an unrestricted process).
> +Newly created UNIX servers
> +within the same Landlock domain
> +continue to be accessible.
> +In this regard,
> +.B LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_RESOLVE_UNIX
> +has the same semantics as the
> +.B LANDLOCK_SCOPE_*

* is variable part, so it should be in italics:

	.BI LANDLOCK_SCOPE_ *

> +flags.
> +.IP
> +If a resolve attempt is denied,

'resolve attempt' seems weird.  Should this be 'resolution attempt'?

> +the operation returns an
> +.B EACCES
> +error,
> +in line with other filesystem access rights
> +(but different to denials for abstract UNIX domain sockets).
> +.IP
> +This access right is available since the ninth version of the Landlock ABI.

I see this is consistent with the rest of the page, but we should change
all of these to use cardinals instead of ordinals (and in digits, not
letters).

>  .P
>  Whether an opened file can be truncated with
>  .BR ftruncate (2)
> @@ -478,6 +510,8 @@ _	_	_
>  \^	\^	LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SUBDOMAINS_OFF
>  _	_	_
>  8	7.0	LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_TSYNC
> +_	_	_
> +9	7.1	LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_RESOLVE_UNIX
>  .TE
>  .P
>  Users should use the Landlock ABI version rather than the kernel version
> @@ -563,7 +597,8 @@ attr.handled_access_fs =
>          LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_SYM |
>          LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER |
>          LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE |
> -        LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV;
> +        LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV |
> +        LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_RESOLVE_UNIX;
>  .EE
>  .in
>  .P
> @@ -578,14 +613,15 @@ and only use the available subset of access rights:
>   * numbers hardcoded to keep the example short.
>   */
>  __u64 landlock_fs_access_rights[] = {
> -    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_SYM  << 1) \- 1,  /* v1                  */
> -    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER     << 1) \- 1,  /* v2: add "refer"     */
> -    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE  << 1) \- 1,  /* v3: add "truncate"  */
> -    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE  << 1) \- 1,  /* v4: TCP support     */
> -    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV << 1) \- 1,  /* v5: add "ioctl_dev" */
> -    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV << 1) \- 1,  /* v6: same            */
> -    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV << 1) \- 1,  /* v7: same            */
> -    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV << 1) \- 1,  /* v8: same            */
> +    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_SYM     << 1) \- 1,  /* v1                     */
> +    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER        << 1) \- 1,  /* v2: add "refer"        */
> +    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE     << 1) \- 1,  /* v3: add "truncate"     */
> +    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_TRUNCATE     << 1) \- 1,  /* v4: TCP support        */
> +    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV    << 1) \- 1,  /* v5: add "ioctl_dev"    */
> +    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV    << 1) \- 1,  /* v6: same               */
> +    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV    << 1) \- 1,  /* v7: same               */
> +    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_IOCTL_DEV    << 1) \- 1,  /* v8: same               */
> +    (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_RESOLVE_UNIX << 1) \- 1,  /* v9: add "resolve_unix" */

We should probably use C99 comments (//), to reduce the width, and
alignment issues.

Feel free to send formatting patches for these side issues.


Cheers,
Alex

>  };
>  \&
>  int abi = landlock_create_ruleset(NULL, 0,
> @@ -598,7 +634,7 @@ if (abi == \-1) {
>      perror("Unable to use Landlock");
>      return;  /* Graceful fallback: Do nothing.  */
>  }
> -abi = MIN(abi, 8);
> +abi = MIN(abi, 9);
>  \&
>  /* Only use the available rights in the ruleset.  */
>  attr.handled_access_fs &= landlock_fs_access_rights[abi \- 1];
> -- 
> 2.54.0
> 
> 

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>