Hi, On 2026-05-29T23:45:55+0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Hi Jann, Amir, > > On 2026-05-29T23:38:11+0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 7:27 PM Jann Horn wrote: > > > > > > The fanotify_mark.2 manpage claims that AT_FDCWD works with a NULL path, > > > but there is no kernel code for that - in fanotify_find_path(), in the > > > `if (filename == NULL)` block, the fd is only used for a normal FD > > > lookup. > > > > > > This was also already the case when this manpage was written back in > > > 2014, so remove the bogus documentation. > > > > > > Fixes: c200b422d ("fanotify_mark.2: New page documenting fanotify_mark(2)") > > > Signed-off-by: Jann Horn > > > > Hah, never noticed this. > > Apparently, hallucinations already existed in 2014 :D > > > > Acked-by: Amir Goldstein > > Thanks! I've added the author of the fixed commit in the recipients. > I'll apply on Monday or so. I've applied the patch and tag now. Thanks! Have a lovely night! Alex > > > Have a lovely night! > Alex > > > > > > --- > > > man/man2/fanotify_mark.2 | 8 -------- > > > 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/man/man2/fanotify_mark.2 b/man/man2/fanotify_mark.2 > > > index e561ffd21..a3b77537c 100644 > > > --- a/man/man2/fanotify_mark.2 > > > +++ b/man/man2/fanotify_mark.2 > > > @@ -560,14 +560,6 @@ defines the filesystem object to be marked. > > > .IP \[bu] > > > If > > > .I path > > > -is NULL, and > > > -.I dirfd > > > -takes the special value > > > -.BR AT_FDCWD , > > > -the current working directory is to be marked. > > > -.IP \[bu] > > > -If > > > -.I path > > > is absolute, it defines the filesystem object to be marked, and > > > .I dirfd > > > is ignored. > > > > > > --- > > > base-commit: 9db8ca91f920b9aba40ed68de6b8da0ca9dbefaa > > > change-id: 20260529-fan-mark-cwd-1c760106eff9 > > > > > > Best regards, > > > -- > > > Jann Horn > > > > > > > -- > --