Linux Manual Pages development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
To: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] man/man5/tunables.conf: Document system-wide tunables config
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2026 02:06:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <anUbLZzOLY2qM6iP@devuan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xnwlu23ngs.fsf@greed.delorie.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2349 bytes --]

Hi DJ,

> Date: 2026-08-06 18:15:15-0400
> From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
>
> Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org> writes:
> > You forgot to sign.
> 
> I will never remember that... :-P
> 
> >> +The resulting data is read when a new process is created by
> >> +.IR ld.so .
> >
> > Sorry for noticing this in v4; I forgot about it.  I see this unresolved
> > issue from earlier versions remains.
> 
> A program is a file on disk.  A process is a running memory image.

Yup.  fork(3) creates a process (produces a new PID).  execve(2)
replaces the image of the current process with a program read from disk
(or in short, executes a program in the current process).

> 
> Neither fork() nor exec() cause the tunables to be loaded, the process
> itself has to do that.  For dynamic ELF programs/processes built with
> glibc, ld.so does it before it passes control to the ELF image.  There
> are other types of programs/processes that do not use ld.so and thus do
> not read the tunables cache (which is called "ld.so.cache" for a reason ;-)

Hmmmmm, let's say you call execve(2) several times without any fork(2)s.
Assuming a that the program paths that you pass to execve(2) are all
dynamic ELF programs built with glibc, I guess for every time you call
execve(2), ld.so(8) will be run, and the tunables stored in ld.so.cache
will be used.  Is this correct?

	#include <unistd.h>
	int
	main(int, char *argv[])
	{
		sleep(1);
		execve("proc/self/exe", argv, NULL);
	}

Let's also say you fork(2) several times, without any execve(2) calls.
I suppose that won't trigger any of this, right?

	#include <unistd.h>
	int
	main(void)
	{
		for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
			sleep(1);
			fork();
		}
	}

From my understanding, only the first program will trigger this more
than once, right?

If so, I'd use the same wording that execve(2) uses:

	execve() executes the program referred to by path.

That is, execve(2) executes programs, and ld.so.cache is read when
a program is executed (in the current process).

> 
> I don't know how to say this clearly with fewer words...
> 
> >> +The syntax allows lines to start with the keyword
> >> +.I include
> >
> > s/I/B/  (since it's a literal, not a variable)
> 
> Fixed.
> 


Cheers,
Alex

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-07  0:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-06 20:44 [PATCH v5 2/4] man/man5/tunables.conf: Document system-wide tunables config DJ Delorie
2026-08-06 22:02 ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-08-06 22:15   ` DJ Delorie
2026-08-07  0:06     ` Alejandro Colomar [this message]
2026-08-07  0:11       ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-08-07  0:15         ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-08-07  3:25       ` DJ Delorie
2026-08-07 22:36         ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-08-08  3:08           ` DJ Delorie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=anUbLZzOLY2qM6iP@devuan \
    --to=alx@kernel.org \
    --cc=dj@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox