From: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
To: Hugo Buddelmeijer <hugo@buddelmeijer.nl>
Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org, g.branden.robinson@gmail.com
Subject: Re: `make -R check` fails due to futex_waitv.2 and console_codes.4 being too wide
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 08:20:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <atW2F1hvJPm2WV5y@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <448efb68-e2ff-41d8-a575-97da30e293ff@buddelmeijer.nl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1447 bytes --]
Hi Hugo,
> Date: 2026-10-17 21:19:22+0200
> From: Hugo Buddelmeijer <hugo@buddelmeijer.nl>
>
> Hi Alejandro,
>
> Running `make -R check` fails because the text in futex_waitv.2 and
> console_codes.4 is too wide.
>
> I noticed this when trying to enable the test phase when updating the
> man-pages package in Guix; see https://codeberg.org/guix/guix/pulls/11893
Thanks a lot for the report. I'm very interested in having make check
pass cleanly.
> That Guix pull request contains a patch to fix the man-pages so `make check`
> passes; said patch is attached.
Thanks!
>
> Maybe you could device a better patch though, in particular for
> console_codes. The affected table is much narrower than similar tables, so
> some lines that have to be truncated, would easily fit in one of the other
> tables. But I couldn't easily figure out what determines the column widths,
> so I didn't fix that.
I think Branden might be better at that; I've added him to CC.
> Also, the Changelog for 6.04 contains some instructions to touch certain
> files to ensure the test suite passes. I did not attempt to use that
> workaround.
Ok.
> Thanks for maintaining these man pages, they contain such a wealth of
> information.
Thanks! :-)
> No need to credit me in case you fix these minor things.
I will, anyway. ;)
>
> Hugo
Have a lovely day!
Alex
--
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-19 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-17 19:19 `make -R check` fails due to futex_waitv.2 and console_codes.4 being too wide Hugo Buddelmeijer
2026-10-19 6:20 ` Alejandro Colomar [this message]
2026-10-19 13:02 ` table layout in console_codes.4 (was: `make -R check` fails due to futex_waitv.2 and console_codes.4 being too wide) G. Branden Robinson
2026-10-19 16:55 ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-10-19 18:32 ` table layout in console_codes.4 Hugo Buddelmeijer
2026-10-19 22:41 ` table layout in console_codes.4 (was: `make -R check` fails due to futex_waitv.2 and console_codes.4 being too wide) G. Branden Robinson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=atW2F1hvJPm2WV5y@debian \
--to=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=g.branden.robinson@gmail.com \
--cc=hugo@buddelmeijer.nl \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox