Hi Kuniyuki,

> Date: 2026-10-24 05:02:06+0000
> From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
>
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2026 23:22:54 +0200, Günther Noack wrote:
> > Use "security context", as in the description of SCM_SECURITY.
> > 
> > Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
> > Assisted-by: LLM
> > Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  man/man7/unix.7 | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/man/man7/unix.7 b/man/man7/unix.7
> > index 4abd216d19c7..67dd10cc146f 100644
> > --- a/man/man7/unix.7
> > +++ b/man/man7/unix.7
> > @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ and returned as the result of
> >  is an integer boolean flag.
> >  .TP
> >  .B SO_PASSSEC
> > -Enables receiving of the security label of the peer socket
> > +Enables receiving of the security context of the peer socket
> 
> Patch 4 touches here, why not squash ?

I prefer not squashing.  It makes the commit messages more specific,
which is easier to understand and review in the future.


Have a lovely day!
Alex

> 
> 
> >  in an ancillary message of type
> >  .B SCM_SECURITY
> >  (see below).
> > -- 
> > 2.56.0
> > 

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>