public inbox for linux-man@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
To: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	linux-man@vger.kernel.org,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: Add write-protect mode docs
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 23:14:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba53034c-582f-1df9-73b5-bfbca109213a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210405131307.2892-6-alx.manpages@gmail.com>

Hello Alex, Peter,

I've applied the patch below, but I have some questions.

On 4/5/21 3:13 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> 
> Userfaultfd write-protect mode is supported starting from Linux 5.7.
> 
> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> [alx: ffix + srcfix]
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@gmail.com>
> ---
>  man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2 | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2 b/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2
> index 014c0b5c1..c29e0bb6a 100644
> --- a/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2
> +++ b/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2
> @@ -234,6 +234,11 @@ operation is supported.
>  The
>  .B UFFDIO_UNREGISTER
>  operation is supported.
> +.TP
> +.B 1 << _UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT
> +The
> +.B UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT
> +operation is supported.
>  .PP
>  This
>  .BR ioctl (2)
> @@ -322,9 +327,6 @@ Track page faults on missing pages.
>  .B UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP
>  Track page faults on write-protected pages.
>  .PP
> -Currently, the only supported mode is
> -.BR UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING .
> -.PP
>  If the operation is successful, the kernel modifies the
>  .I ioctls
>  bit-mask field to indicate which
> @@ -443,6 +445,16 @@ operation:
>  .TP
>  .B UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_DONTWAKE
>  Do not wake up the thread that waits for page-fault resolution
> +.TP
> +.B UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP
> +Copy the page with read-only permission.
> +This allows the user to trap the next write to the page,

What is "the user" in this context? I think you really mean 
something like "the fault-handling thread"" or something
like that?

> +which will block and generate another write-protect userfault message.
> +This is only used when both
> +.B UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING
> +and
> +.B UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP
> +modes are enabled for the registered range.
>  .PP
>  The
>  .I copy
> @@ -654,6 +666,74 @@ field of the
>  structure was not a multiple of the system page size; or
>  .I len
>  was zero; or the specified range was otherwise invalid.
> +.SS UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT (Since Linux 5.7)
> +Write-protect or write-unprotect an userfaultfd registered memory range
> +registered with mode
> +.BR UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP .
> +.PP
> +The
> +.I argp
> +argument is a pointer to a
> +.I uffdio_range
> +structure as shown below:
> +.PP
> +.in +4n
> +.EX
> +struct uffdio_writeprotect {
> +    struct uffdio_range range; /* Range to change write permission*/
> +    __u64 mode;                /* Mode to change write permission */
> +};
> +.EE
> +.in
> +.PP
> +There're two mode bits that are supported in this structure:
> +.TP
> +.B UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT_MODE_WP
> +When this mode bit is set,
> +the ioctl will be a write-protect operation upon the memory range specified by
> +.IR range .
> +Otherwise it'll be a write-unprotect operation upon the specified range,
> +which can be used to resolve an userfaultfd write-protect page fault.
> +.TP
> +.B UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT_MODE_DONTWAKE
> +When this mode bit is set,
> +do not wake up any thread that waits for
> +page-fault resolution after the operation.
> +This could only be specified if
> +.B UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT_MODE_WP
> +is not specified.
> +.PP
> +This
> +.BR ioctl (2)
> +operation returns 0 on success.
> +On error, \-1 is returned and
> +.I errno
> +is set to indicate the error.
> +Possible errors include:
> +.TP
> +.B EINVAL
> +The
> +.I start
> +or the
> +.I len
> +field of the
> +.I ufdio_range
> +structure was not a multiple of the system page size; or
> +.I len
> +was zero; or the specified range was otherwise invalid.
> +.TP
> +.B EAGAIN
> +The process was interrupted; retry this call.
> +.TP
> +.B ENOENT
> +The range specified in
> +.I range
> +is not valid.
> +For example, the virtual address does not exist,
> +or not registered with userfaultfd write-protect mode.
> +.TP
> +.B EFAULT
> +Encountered a generic fault during processing.
>  .SH RETURN VALUE
>  See descriptions of the individual operations, above.
>  .SH ERRORS

Thanks,

Michael


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-05 21:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-05 13:13 [PATCH 0/5] Merged patches from others Alejandro Colomar
2021-04-05 13:13 ` [PATCH 1/5] scanf.3: clarify that %n supports type modifiers Alejandro Colomar
2021-04-05 19:48   ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2021-04-05 13:13 ` [PATCH 2/5] userfaultfd.2: Add UFFD_FEATURE_THREAD_ID docs Alejandro Colomar
2021-04-05 19:56   ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2021-04-05 20:01     ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2021-04-05 13:13 ` [PATCH 3/5] userfaultfd.2: Add write-protect mode Alejandro Colomar
2021-04-05 21:13   ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2021-04-06 16:36     ` Peter Xu
2021-04-05 13:13 ` [PATCH 4/5] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: Add UFFD_FEATURE_THREAD_ID docs Alejandro Colomar
2021-04-05 21:13   ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2021-04-05 13:13 ` [PATCH 5/5] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: Add write-protect mode docs Alejandro Colomar
2021-04-05 21:14   ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) [this message]
2021-04-06  8:10 ` [PATCH 0/5] Merged patches from others Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ba53034c-582f-1df9-73b5-bfbca109213a@gmail.com \
    --to=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=alx.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox