From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: [Bug 119351] New: misleading information about buffer size limits in
tcp(7)
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 17:49:59 +0000
Message-ID:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path:
Sender: linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119351
Bug ID: 119351
Summary: misleading information about buffer size limits in
tcp(7)
Product: Documentation
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: man-pages
Assignee: documentation_man-pages-ztI5WcYan/vQLgFONoPN62D2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org
Reporter: nyh-TS7m/3hpY0sOpacJJkBjfT4kX+cae0hd@public.gmane.org
Regression: No
The tcp(7) discussion on SO_SNDBUF and SO_RCVBUF contains the statement that:
"The maximum sizes for socket buffers declared via the SO_SNDBUF and
SO_RCVBUF mechanisms are limited by the values in the
/proc/sys/net/core/rmem_max and /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_max files."
However, other sources seem to suggest that the files
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem and /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_rmem (mentioned in the
previous paragraph) actually contain the relevant limits (the third value in
each file), while the core/ files are only relevant to other protocols. This is
actually explained in tcp(7), down in the "tcp_rmem" section of the "/proc
interfaces".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html