From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Subject: [Bug 119351] New: misleading information about buffer size limits in tcp(7) Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 17:49:59 +0000 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Sender: linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119351 Bug ID: 119351 Summary: misleading information about buffer size limits in tcp(7) Product: Documentation Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: man-pages Assignee: documentation_man-pages-ztI5WcYan/vQLgFONoPN62D2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org Reporter: nyh-TS7m/3hpY0sOpacJJkBjfT4kX+cae0hd@public.gmane.org Regression: No The tcp(7) discussion on SO_SNDBUF and SO_RCVBUF contains the statement that: "The maximum sizes for socket buffers declared via the SO_SNDBUF and SO_RCVBUF mechanisms are limited by the values in the /proc/sys/net/core/rmem_max and /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_max files." However, other sources seem to suggest that the files /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem and /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_rmem (mentioned in the previous paragraph) actually contain the relevant limits (the third value in each file), while the core/ files are only relevant to other protocols. This is actually explained in tcp(7), down in the "tcp_rmem" section of the "/proc interfaces". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html