From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6BAC4338F for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 15:41:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D07860EFE for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 15:41:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240779AbhHYPlx (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Aug 2021 11:41:53 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38590 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231995AbhHYPlv (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Aug 2021 11:41:51 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81BE160F91 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 15:41:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1629906065; bh=G+wS3EMCP8/z6MeEYjViZZijyfAXowYrjypXvvM9hS0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SLyuFI7b0p8jSqZWL24di/3xePjobc0SjeRg8d8ZdxMyJQElLKcDQU8G852QN0Els ERtzQzrSJbnujt5mOvUjm8pRDg748aEd0sSPnZfgpn7XHtjJBAgyMXE3AslchP7SCp HBn5vIVSXoBFteRHK+/L0Icc51DBjEDjLNvBnOjB27d/IdLjIKuECwTxwzryQi0e4F +ZKqSbSKxdeTnfdEuii/Ppk1KI30E+cdbWZeBTBfp4tyNxbk2JetkVLVsjCoj4hjpw sPFnTH6YcYN8KLW8+7nNnG56qbKq5F2XAF75zjHm66DYG9wljoplJEwB0SjOUsoBDB Ax0LEA8g1rXww== From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org To: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 214171] I am not sure why the definition of EAI_SYSTEM, from getaddrinfo, was changed from POSIX Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 15:41:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo documentation_man-pages@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Product: Documentation X-Bugzilla-Component: man-pages X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: alx.manpages@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: documentation_man-pages@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D214171 Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) (alx.manpages@gmail.com) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alx.manpages@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) (alx.manpages@gmail.com) = --- It seems reasonable to have doubts about if (ret =3D=3D EAI_SYSTEM && errno= =3D=3D 0) can happen, with the current wording. Perhaps we can use a wording similar to most pages' RETURN VALUE section: [ EAI_SYSTEM Other system error; errno is set to indicate the error. ] This is more explicit in that "errno is _set_". Hmm? --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.=