From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E704EC433F5 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 20:55:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240895AbiBQUza (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2022 15:55:30 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:41172 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240200AbiBQUz3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Feb 2022 15:55:29 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25334606E5 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 12:55:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C22F1B824C4 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 20:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69E4CC340EC for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 20:55:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1645131310; bh=H05k0QgALK4NeM0dpVg2tTElNKgonEHvji4Pcgnpz2s=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=AXDwPsaumOQA/xDM3i8IuPWkXC8oSgK+dcbugnVlYHYGiuBnfREMEe6K8b6RhjsZ2 q6aP88XSMmq+X3u2JGyeqWhN1O0Ql/pOmqeQBL0144l3BsiZMXugQRkffFVEYK9KE0 ammEOvL0PKoyLXvaU5C91lH3bjWziRab1sYEQPbXYNNNr/w5MtAOJAPTmS8H9Uc5yB Sbd9DhfvTpGsqnX1D5ahgyrZfOxSX3xNcseTXAArF3tVqXP5cZugNSB2SGGUcyERsS /7T1p6xc6IS0ET+ONCrseKts5CLRoU6S1VJWC8ZKKwYUpVA6IpHAWv4YoOPzIRBTOT 0zGmRE9J0TUzQ== Received: by aws-us-west-2-korg-bugzilla-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4FAE2CC13AF; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 20:55:10 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org To: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 215613] uri.7: DESCRIPTION: Usage: No description of the 'unix' URI scheme Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 20:55:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo documentation_man-pages@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Product: Documentation X-Bugzilla-Component: man-pages X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: t.piekarski@deloquencia.de X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: documentation_man-pages@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D215613 Thomas Piekarski (t.piekarski@deloquencia.de) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.piekarski@deloquencia.de --- Comment #1 from Thomas Piekarski (t.piekarski@deloquencia.de) --- I took a look into it and I have been unable to find any RFC for Unix domain socket URI schema for comparing if it is the same like file URI schema.=20 The IANA is not listing it [1]. The W3C is not listing it [2]. The RFC for Uniform Resource Locators [3] is not mentioning it nor does the= RFC for file [4]. Well later was just a shot :-) Maybe it is due to its nature for being used for inter-process communicatio= n, but from where such schema similar to internet schemas derive from? The form is the same, but do unix://localhost/var/some-socket.sock accept s= uch a form with localhost inside like file does? And do they behave the same in regards of file permissions? --- [1]: https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/uri-schemes.xhtml [2]: https://www.w3.org/wiki/UriSchemes [3]: https://www.w3.org/Addressing/rfc1738.txt [4]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8089.html --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.=