From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0130C433F5 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 11:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1349870AbiCXLvU (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2022 07:51:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38910 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1349864AbiCXLvU (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2022 07:51:20 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6E3790249 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 04:49:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6532BB8222E for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 11:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29AA5C340F3 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 11:49:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1648122586; bh=ciK1k7Xt8f1hCHKzCTIFXThbwiaNS/0BGrjTPNvdb/w=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MO+ip3hhwHIbB8Q4CF48gZ9/JDekFvVGzDn+ZGyxoElZc2a+vySjvp4EyVI1BbOd7 Xpzx2+04YgBn0ajx4OUcuirh0hoaAiA3214q1emQLPvUdzK+3colGBlLZOdV4O9DVS S1x0joqqvrK6o+F6RjflGH/FsdWqzCoL3JtymsMJXCpDuMFoEbO31f9iZ2YKZjAd+j jZ/jSn0neDgCJlDgKpcldiQU3pRJPpXpiKracp7Q5SAL4TCl8RFTHhOXsufOYnQfGl YiK5gT/Vym1aRCoZpAg5PhmrE4JmMmAKkDB64PxPWS3sHXTg2TbdBMFU3J6zVI7qOt H6HGJGhlZpZHw== Received: by aws-us-west-2-korg-bugzilla-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 13840C05FD0; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 11:49:46 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org To: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 215736] uri.7: DESCRIPTION: Usage: ldap: Reference to obsolete IETF RFCs 2251, 2253, 2254, and 2255 Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 11:49:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo documentation_man-pages@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Product: Documentation X-Bugzilla-Component: man-pages X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: alx.manpages@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: documentation_man-pages@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D215736 Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) (alx.manpages@gmail.com) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|uri.7: DESCRIPTION: Usage: |uri.7: DESCRIPTION: Usage: |ldap: Reference to obsolete |ldap: Reference to obsolete |IETF RFC 2255 |IETF RFCs 2251, 2253, 2254, | |and 2255 --- Comment #1 from Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) (alx.manpages@gmail.com) = --- More references to obsolete RFCs[2][3][4] in the same ldap entry: ``` dn the LDAP Distinguished Name, which identifies the base object of the LDAP search (see RFC 2253 section 3). attributes a comma-separated list of attributes to be returned; see RFC 2251 section 4.1.5. If omitted, all attributes should be returned. scope specifies the scope of the search, which can be one of "base" (for a base object search), "one" (for a one-level search), or "sub" (for a subtree search). If scope is omitted, "base" is assumed. filter specifies the search filter (subset of en- tries to return). If omitted, all entries should be returned. See RFC 2254 sec- tion 4. ``` [2]: [3]: [4]: --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.=