From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
To: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 215848] New: fopen(3): Incorrect good practice suggestion
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 17:05:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-215848-11311@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215848
Bug ID: 215848
Summary: fopen(3): Incorrect good practice suggestion
Product: Documentation
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: man-pages
Assignee: documentation_man-pages@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
Reporter: rootkea@gmail.com
Regression: No
Hello!
From fopen(3):
"Therefore it is good practice (and indeed sometimes necessary under Linux) to
put an fseek(3) or fgetpos(3) operation between write and read operations on
such a stream."
I am not sure about the origin of this good practice but fgetpos(3) seems
wrong. It has to be fsetpos(3) if I'm reading the C standard and POSIX[0]
correctly.
BTW, calling fsetpos(3) will require a call to fgetpos(3) first. So why is it
being advised as a good practice to call two functions (`fgetpos` and then
`fsetpos`)? Maybe just i) mention fseek(3) only OR ii) mention fseek(3) and
fflush(3) (instead of fsetpos(3))?
[0]
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799.2018edition/functions/fopen.html
Thanks!
Regards,
Avinash Sonawane (rootKea)
https://www.rootkea.me
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
next reply other threads:[~2022-04-17 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-17 17:05 bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2022-04-18 3:32 ` [Bug 215848] fopen(3): Incorrect good practice suggestion bugzilla-daemon
2022-05-14 12:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-215848-11311@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox