From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCF0641AAC for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 08:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743409079; cv=none; b=U7c5QJFghTmQF8TXBii8lzRRlct50tpzK8yRPGBa7CYw3SbN9JxiOpwNpyfu85qi1Aj2LuYvgZ/E/Y+Ss64UN134u3KmxXNCSqU81EGmRVU3v8YJb/5LPpfeBtGnjo2zRiUYPIo0jr1PxMepHCKLNO+FvbQ0F77yu2sGW82fTQI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743409079; c=relaxed/simple; bh=momboR6IJBOFrgulpgN4ThYr043e60J1xE/W1yC1fxE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=RxPoIwOQbcAhOEqMJjFB2pDoorgTrq+zUwegfpvVGaekNuMadBNGEdeTbJ5i3p5Vvb/bjDrpK1Wbv7EFCouYIEPKyVipyXG42llrJpb8VsXvZP4qWUkIjU1ER5eOXXMlryqk5h1ig9H8GWCb15ksIwsSnUS9O2pnEF9rDSfBsTc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=P1ONHfwH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="P1ONHfwH" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4924DC4CEED for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 08:17:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1743409079; bh=momboR6IJBOFrgulpgN4ThYr043e60J1xE/W1yC1fxE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=P1ONHfwHdPcbIOIdjcNKwwXXOSkO2tEgr8rhDeMOGFTH1lS5PL3w5llEgPj9yJaEV SVYebCisolwUr5fabRdqeMHSEPIbZkDczpi36BwdbTVtYkYK49cxjl+XNmDBXI/EjT 5klHqQFmOX3LKPt+Rb+gV3l1J7OanfzRVuvhbfA1n1g1KeGAGwt+0F1ekXCY7DJpu1 0qc0GSFSzoBfibwf1SB0IUZRKhK52TFxCOBmXx4uqN0hd4rdvvpJjXW2dGw4eAAvb+ pR2p5Rcnjn25l3A5FNsMJr5TuFuDR9iGs8FmmLwHa/UMwUlabTMzHMkY9lnpBWNWzd yt5YeG9UOQZ8A== Received: by aws-us-west-2-korg-bugzilla-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 366ABC53BC9; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 08:17:59 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org To: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 219822] mount option lazytime is independent of strictatime/relatime/noatime Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 08:17:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo documentation_man-pages@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Product: Documentation X-Bugzilla-Component: man-pages X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: alx@kernel.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: documentation_man-pages@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219822 --- Comment #1 from Alejandro Colomar (alx@kernel.org) --- Hi, On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 04:55:40PM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219822 >=20 > Bug ID: 219822 > Summary: mount option lazytime is independent of > strictatime/relatime/noatime > Product: Documentation > Version: unspecified > Hardware: All > OS: Linux > Status: NEW > Severity: normal > Priority: P3 > Component: man-pages > Assignee: documentation_man-pages@kernel-bugs.osdl.org > Reporter: cquike@arcor.de > Regression: No >=20 > According to a message from Theodore Ts'o ([1]) the lazytime option in mo= unt > is > "independent" of the other atime behaviours. >=20 > I see that the man page explains what lazytime does but it is not clearly > stated that it can be combined with other options like strictatime or > relatime. >=20 >=20 > [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg86233.html Would you mind sending a patch to the mailing list and CCing Ted and any one (or any list) else that would be interested? See also: Have a lovely day! Alex >=20 > --=20 > You may reply to this email to add a comment. >=20 > You are receiving this mail because: > You are watching the assignee of the bug. --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.=