From: bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
To: linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: [Bug 57181] man pages for C structs
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 13:28:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-57181-11311-4EEooUkWsf@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-57181-11311-3bo0kxnWaOQUvHkbgXJLS5sdmw4N0Rt+2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57181
--- Comment #3 from Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> ---
(In reply to Serge van den Boom from comment #2)
> Ok, how is this for a start:
>
> timeval -> ctime(3)
> timespec -> nanosleep(2)
So here's an example of ptroblem. 'struct timespec' is in 15 pages. Why point
to this one in particular. I can see it's not a bad page to point to. But, if
you are using one of the other APIs, then laning on nanosleep(2) would be
confusing.
> sockaddr -> bind(2)
> sockaddr_in -> ip(7)
> in_addr -> inet(3)
> in_addr -> ip(7)
> in_addr_t -> inet(3)
> sockaddr_in6 -> ipv6(7)
> in6_addr -> ipv6(7)
> addrinfo -> getaddrinfo(3)
> iovec -> recv(2)
> msghdr -> send(2) / recv(2)
> cmsghd -> cmsg(3)
> dirent -> readdir(3)
> pollfd -> poll(2)
> epoll_event -> epoll_ctl(2)
> rlimit -> getrlimit(2)
>
> To further illustrate why this would be useful, consider the following
> situation: you are coding in C and want to use sendmsg(). Before you write
> that line, you would define a struct msghdr, and fill its fields. But you
> don't recall what exactly the fields of struct msghdr should contain.
> Right now, you'd go through the following steps:
> 1. Where would I find the definition of msghdr? I want to use it in
> 'sendmesg', so that's probably where it is.
> 2. 'man sendmesg'
> 3. search for msghdr
> With separate pages per struct, you would be able to skip steps 1 and 2. In
> fact, if you use Vim, you would just enter 'K' when the cursor is on
> 'msghdr'.
> With redirects, you'd still have step 3, but you wouldn't have the
> (distracting) step of deciding where you'd expect to find it.
>
> (Also, 'struct mesghdr' includes a field of type 'struct iovec', which is
> not defined in send(2). This is probably a separate issue though.)
>
> For structures like sockaddr_in, step 1 is even harder, as there is no clue
> to where to find a page on its definition. You would have to know somehow
> that it can be found in ip(7).
I don't really buy this reasoning. If I'm using sendmsg(), then I'm probably on
that page already before step 1.
So, I don't think this approach (llinks as described above) is really helpful.
Now, whether there should be separate pages for a few structures is something
to think about more, but I'd need to see a good reason in each case.
(sigevent(7) had a good reason, for example.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-15 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-27 11:19 [Bug 57181] New: man pages for C structs bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r
[not found] ` <bug-57181-11311-3bo0kxnWaOQUvHkbgXJLS5sdmw4N0Rt+2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org/>
2014-03-15 8:22 ` [Bug 57181] " bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r
2014-03-15 11:35 ` bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r
2014-03-15 13:28 ` bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r [this message]
2014-03-15 16:25 ` bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r
2014-03-17 7:39 ` bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r
2014-03-19 7:20 ` bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r
2015-05-05 9:16 ` bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-57181-11311-4EEooUkWsf@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon-590eeb7gvniway/ihj7yzeb+6bgklq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).