From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: [Bug 95421] Outdated documentation on posix_fadvise?
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 08:57:52 +0000
Message-ID: <bug-95421-11311-tvcEABiC9W@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
References: <bug-95421-11311@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <bug-95421-11311-3bo0kxnWaOQUvHkbgXJLS5sdmw4N0Rt+2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org/>
Sender: linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
To: linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95421

--- Comment #2 from Maik Zumstrull <maik-pC6eOnvJXUcJGwgDXS7ZQA@public.gmane.org> ---
Last paragraph under NOTES. "Pages that have not yet been written out will be
unaffected, so if the application wishes to guarantee that pages will be
released, it should call fsync(2) or fdatasync(2) first."

Unless I'm misreading the code, this is not true.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html