From: bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
To: linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: [Bug 97161] bootparam(7): 'debug' parameter: reference to <linux/kernel.h> for information on log levels is misleading.
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:50:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-97161-11311-8cZpWQ6cfB@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-97161-11311-3bo0kxnWaOQUvHkbgXJLS5sdmw4N0Rt+2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97161
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Resolution|--- |CODE_FIX
--- Comment #3 from Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> ---
(In reply to Alain Kalker from comment #0)
> The section on the 'debug' parameter refers the user to <linux/kernel.h> for
> more information on kernel log levels, however, that file contains neither a
> description of console_loglevel nor nor a description of the various log
> levels.
>
> The closest I can find is <include/linux/kern_levels.h>, which defines the
> various log levels but doesn't explain console_loglevel, Also, it only
> exists in recent kernels, version 3.5 and up.
> Another candidate would be <include/linux/printk.h>, which does define
> console_loglevel but doesn't explain the individual log levels.
>
> Perhaps both references (<include/linux/printk.h>,
> <include/linux/kern_levels.h>) could be included?
Hello Alain,
I must say I'm generally quite unhappy with the sate of the bootparam(7) page.
I'm actually not sure that it was ever a good idea to create it to begin with.
But that happened 20 years ago, well before my time as maintainer. As it is
now, the page is *horribly( dated, and your report made me seriously think of
just removing the page! As it is, I have settled for discarding 60% of the
page, and fixing a few of the more glaring errors in the remainder. Regarding
your report, I amended the test on 'debug' to read:
Boot arguments for use by kernel developers
'debug'
Kernel messages are handed off to a daemon (e.g.,
klogd(8) or similar) so that they may be logged to disk.
Messages with a priority above console_loglevel are also
printed on the console. (For a discussion of these lev‐
els, see syslog(2).) By default, console_loglevel is
set to log messages at levels higher than KERN_DEBUG.
This boot argument will cause the kernel to also print
messages logged at level KERN_DEBUG. The console
loglevel can also be set on a booted system via the
/proc/sys/kernel/printk file (described in syslog(2)),
the syslog(2) SYSLOG_ACTION_CONSOLE_LEVEL operation, or
dmesg(8).
I believe that should address your concerns, so I'm closing the bug.
Cheers,
Michael
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-24 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-23 17:07 [Bug 97161] New: bootparam(7): 'debug' parameter: reference to <linux/kernel.h> for information on log levels is misleading bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r
[not found] ` <bug-97161-11311-3bo0kxnWaOQUvHkbgXJLS5sdmw4N0Rt+2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org/>
2015-04-23 17:10 ` [Bug 97161] " bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r
2015-04-23 22:19 ` bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r
2015-04-24 11:50 ` bugzilla-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-97161-11311-8cZpWQ6cfB@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon-590eeb7gvniway/ihj7yzeb+6bgklq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).