linux-man.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	dave-gkUM19QKKo4@public.gmane.org
Cc: mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFCv3] add manpages for Memory Protection Keys
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 14:25:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d5ce21ad-ec2c-5a56-dde2-7cbd62dd2c49@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57519A04.5020700-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

On 06/03/2016 09:53 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 06/02/2016 05:25 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> The convention for man-pages is that new sentences always start 
>> of new source lines. (This makes subsequent patches less "noisy", 
>> since the common unit of change in a text is a sentence.)
>> Could you fix this throughout please?
> 
> Yep, I can do that, and I'll also integrate all of your comments,
> although I won't respond to all of them individually, I will integrate them.
> 
>>> +no longer be used in any protection-key-related operations.
>>> +.PP
>>> +.RB ( pkey_alloc ())
>>> +.I flags
>>> +may contain zero or more disable operations:
>>
>> Why "zero or more" rather than "zero or one"? I mean:
>> what sense could it make to OR together PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS and
>> PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE?
> 
> This is one of the attributes of the hardware that I carried up in to
> the interfaces.  The hardware contains two bits: one to write-disable
> and one to access-disable.  You're allowed to set both at the same time,
> even though the "access" bit overrules the "write" bit when set.
> 
> So, it doesn't make a ton of logical sense with these two flags, but it
> might if we ever got an "execute disable" feature or some other feature
> that could be combined more arbitrarily.

So, I have a suggestion. How about tightening the constraint here, so
that only one of these flags is allowed for now. (EINVAL if both
are specified.) That constraint could always be relaxed later , if
desired, and adding it now may allow some wriggle room later in terms
of modifying the API or allowing for different architectural choices.

Cheers,

Michael

-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-03 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1464826600-17110-1-git-send-email-dave.hansen@intel.com>
     [not found] ` <1464826600-17110-1-git-send-email-dave.hansen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-03  0:25   ` [PATCH] [RFCv3] add manpages for Memory Protection Keys Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
     [not found]     ` <647d23bf-a163-deee-d0ec-f961ecfb0b90-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-03 14:53       ` Dave Hansen
     [not found]         ` <57519A04.5020700-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-03 19:25           ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) [this message]
     [not found]             ` <d5ce21ad-ec2c-5a56-dde2-7cbd62dd2c49-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-03 19:35               ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
     [not found]                 ` <2c4a4bff-7907-9c2d-389a-5bf987a14ad6-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-03 20:26                   ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d5ce21ad-ec2c-5a56-dde2-7cbd62dd2c49@gmail.com \
    --to=mtk.manpages-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dave-gkUM19QKKo4@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).