From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E96C4741F for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 14:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B92520796 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 14:16:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="XpiD1zqB" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732381AbgJAOQT (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 10:16:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55916 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732339AbgJAOQT (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 10:16:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x442.google.com (mail-wr1-x442.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::442]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2A0BC0613D0 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 07:16:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x442.google.com with SMTP id k10so5973527wru.6 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 07:16:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Gvrc0wRqth957LexWFKEtzJqZw1jFJ1AA68MSEMCWCE=; b=XpiD1zqBYh5aRBFjlg+SZFlfLuPiCpVuiEKW+uOpFoS0Tj5UlhPP4Wt3OW80SI19DW W+0O9J+72IFWAtCi/bvFno3LAWsHH0L3zj6UXQGp6qEkjGF2QYeyzCC7oaS5xz2MHYzg FMSqRi8B2hSLLYHgSw0z/nkk6qq8XX5aiByYwPx+ARoYr2EWIOMkAuCdeiOuM3inOxiT vZrImGTXjD5gLFYimFQEOl4JpJC+nEBDC7/qzNIOpVtAg9NG8+f481IzzkN5SDpgXB93 T/5buw4AsbXiWF774V4uzx0rr8w40oygK6AbMgbxeyBu5iwJTRBSutXm7zVQN4+KdFsD ztmg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Gvrc0wRqth957LexWFKEtzJqZw1jFJ1AA68MSEMCWCE=; b=aRPb6X2q0kltgBibIBxiiz9nhROdRVlC8RpJqtgK3nrVpliLWIOKdug73x84TP556H UoicWMXpc6kpHpKwwDKHR6+JL/i3TIspmjc8cf8J/Ek8jPsRBRKww9o5e0WlWQXSMZsR AYoTM/X69ysHpLs2CQiq9SlyzE94dBFbukrcXGofHYyIy+kCv+RBZ8M6YyC9RN9Rm7pS dDLhZBmByF+VViy4VrZJI4srKZtvLFfrAAV1vjRRLqaXkDIMo42c/7fn7uiGIafMAJUR 7N6QXsqiN9H5rTJgN5g+guuwx/8WwfUv8RDvxXJRd6fC8ncVi50TXtLe4MGRtBzP8y1R wfMw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532DK7Nx5xedcHs+Q9QdKdVCLGd6auwKlsINIpYhHTD8dOAoKMl4 IzDdDXdS7iqw59ANE3FEaYQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxfeD6C35eY0EKU9UNkSaX/q/H6mfnplOS8bsrAUrR/z7PTz4Z7PnjVPVz6xXcAm9w0Ob8EOg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fa52:: with SMTP id y18mr9386145wrr.264.1601561777434; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 07:16:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.143] ([170.253.60.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x10sm137096wmi.37.2020.10.01.07.16.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Oct 2020 07:16:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/16] system_data_types.7: Add int_fastN_t family of types To: Jonathan Wakely Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, linux-man@vger.kernel.org, GNU C Library , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" References: <20201001101559.77163-1-colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com> <20201001101559.77163-6-colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com> <8dc9e60d-f838-87d5-2fc6-c34a84118916@gmail.com> From: Alejandro Colomar Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 16:16:15 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org On 2020-10-01 13:27, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> How would you word that? > > I gave a suggestion above. Oops, I missed that. Thanks, Alex