public inbox for linux-man@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@gmail.com>
To: Helge Kreutzmann <debian@helgefjell.de>
Cc: mario.blaettermann@gmail.com, linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Issue in man page keyrings.7
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2022 22:14:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ebdfc516-76ea-30a6-7b97-f34a434d40eb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221204135708.GC441@Debian-50-lenny-64-minimal>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1228 bytes --]

Hi Helge,

On 12/4/22 14:57, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello Alejandro,
> On Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 12:47:52PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>> On 12/4/22 10:07, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
>>> Without further ado, the following was found:
>>>
>>> Issue:    pinned → anchored?
>>>
>>> "Process credentials themselves reference keyrings with specific semantics."
>>> "These keyrings are pinned as long as the set of credentials exists, which is"
>>> "usually as long as the process exists."
>>
>> I'm not sure.  I see uses of both terms, and don't know the interfaces
>> enough to be able to tell which term is more appropriate here.  Please CC
>> any developers of those interfaces and see what they think about it.
> 
> Well, you have a subtitle called:
> 
> Anchoring keys
> 
> (Just a few lines above this paragraph). Thus I wondered if this is a
> different concept than pinning.
> 
> I mark it WONTFIX for now in our sources, so it does not get reported
> again.

No, please, report it again.  It's just that I don't know at the moment.  I'd 
like to confirm this report.

Cheers,

Alex

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Greetings
> 
>           Helge
> 

-- 
<http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-04 21:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-04  9:07 Issue in man page keyrings.7 Helge Kreutzmann
2022-12-04 11:47 ` Alejandro Colomar
2022-12-04 13:57   ` Helge Kreutzmann
2022-12-04 21:14     ` Alejandro Colomar [this message]
2022-12-05 17:13       ` Helge Kreutzmann
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-12-04  9:07 Helge Kreutzmann
2022-12-04 11:49 ` Alejandro Colomar
2022-03-13 12:34 Helge Kreutzmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ebdfc516-76ea-30a6-7b97-f34a434d40eb@gmail.com \
    --to=alx.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=debian@helgefjell.de \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.blaettermann@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox