From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Subject: Re: Rewording language in mbind(2) to "threads" not "processes" Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:08:59 +0200 Message-ID: References: <67165fae-b965-eb34-ecf5-4247acaecee1@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Christoph Lameter Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, Piotr Kwapulinski , mhocko@kernel.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, Peter Zijlstra , Rik van Riel , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , lkml , linux-man , Brice Goglin List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org On 10/21/2016 03:44 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > >> Did you have any thoughts on my follow-on question below? > > There was only one AFAICT? > >>> Thanks. So, are all the other cases where I changed "process" to >>> "thread" okay then? > >>>From what I see yes. > > Thanks, Christoph. I've added a Reviewed-by from you. Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org