From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCD5C433E2 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 18:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57706207BB for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 18:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Xw2UJtXp" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725936AbgIMSLp (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Sep 2020 14:11:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48536 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725876AbgIMSLp (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Sep 2020 14:11:45 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x441.google.com (mail-wr1-x441.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::441]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84499C06174A for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:11:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x441.google.com with SMTP id x14so16270094wrl.12 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:11:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ttTS5IrGO/2EMTFj5jOpmz4cCh6ghl/eCZNVbivX020=; b=Xw2UJtXplM3t6XwPDR6iUW0ocwvzQongc2s+EiJ0GBn23ksZ4WY57+APvi3eeKv9nf K/1Gw9pnjI5tOxHHIpiVo3XqnRB0DFR1pPDVt372Dn4He0tdvZkzrnV/a1PK32keel40 Mbqd0NZ1f6y8kujuejBVvR7ckF+7PLpJyDV7DbiQLwtXmgh4yGubtRLP2MPobOn+4ZmA hs40fJ9Gk5B/XloQ6jB3zkpQHqPDIPF+X+EXRUvY/O82AcUke8NQvDRJy46JHvadodQ/ X5dwqecIApHUwIPWeiMe6Bzf0QEA6MQTGEvlQRncbHxFX/3QK6q55CRr3cK9jT0bzjGX ekRg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ttTS5IrGO/2EMTFj5jOpmz4cCh6ghl/eCZNVbivX020=; b=Y97AFmomKvnsAq/rJddwNKKkYtZpoNXEzcz3kboUx8iM7A+rg+yXwluS5UDHVtpKN5 SxVAe/NSB4GM04bU+AwT15U2VFycfgqhqDXEcm6JdKTLvOQ4XQNpGOTB9PaVapkkT3Mv qodhqFtWN1gkFrlVs8XefYrhRPEVdRhhuEC2QuHTsVN28WTr6zMUzDRYOldoPjXyOfQ6 qe9dsQ06aSvamrQp7iibotnzIQT24YbFCClnEgc4qjFzuL7g2DDGYVEj412K5zsIT5zv bjOErGHidB8iyWP9JVxYpiy5CA7yk7UpK4ATB6mp99+5o7wnZCCs0CLXcSe4Z5elhRJ5 9VKw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530YIqkq8qsCFyU6KC3Th/WlUH6KvcaxP1jImUysslsBhhLWwWPI hR1jPwlpL/+HX624nGvAaQ6nBC1tCQqGPA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJycjiWfr5TOBF9Hz8Qi/42ZU5rLEtTONzikHS64/pWGM19qCcTVbiW8dr294UytBeixHYxWOQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4c52:: with SMTP id n18mr11836356wrt.267.1600020698902; Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.160] ([93.115.133.118]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d5sm17246715wrb.28.2020.09.13.11.11.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 13 Sep 2020 11:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] getpwent_r.3: Cast 'uid_t' to 'intmax_t' for printf() To: mtk.manpages@gmail.com Cc: linux-man References: <20200911231411.28406-1-colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com> <20200911231411.28406-6-colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com> <867a2a99-5d14-6c01-62fc-f4daef538289@gmail.com> From: Alejandro Colomar Message-ID: Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 20:11:37 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-man-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org On 9/13/20 2:04 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > Well, I said none of my arguments was too compelling... I think that > I'd take one big patch. Perhaps first, could you send me an estimate > of how many pages you think might be changed in the patch. BTW, please don't apply the patches about [u]intmax_t from this patchset: I included them in the big patch so they are all together. Thanks, Alex