From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E0AB26AC3 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:34:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777286081; cv=none; b=mgHtJLquL+t0eiU+FC5iPKg95tepjJubs34+szgi2LF4MwuUSs2Jyy3/g8LFh9U3B1sBzd6Ice49OcM+soqNdZTk+XfpCxmWTIrMWot3DaW+zj0wAHnt4zwmnqlK1q/bLOPSdLBIdgNJJVxgTvSz8WcTIPqFhUZEOJQ5ugi+0FY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777286081; c=relaxed/simple; bh=96Qu9ZHHV2Ks20BueuPC7Z9kdEP0/EQqB9wFX9RVzaE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DWsI6b4V4PvwbU6Fr9elPhbXj7DhvSijpYJp1vT2TZlh7GpcGsuQF3G6RbikZhFXAm38CLSnfbJHxUzEaScD64IQj5MNUbE8Wr/sRMBGGqTRJS2sozKlNJGmlFDAGIkp+APfNzDKMvzd/ElWatHVwjv4/tk/IGXtbaUubUOO7jI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=BbmUs8UH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="BbmUs8UH" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1777286079; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nYKIC1X5gpN9hRMqIZKYUsa7y5yhIxAf4oCYaIDdOeA=; b=BbmUs8UHwoaTEVRsEAfZBOCY+0WNQD6xDqlf1SH+GE9F+c9PyORKpDDKuZi8AkE97YPJnU kf5d2CimD6j348tXrHqSMqtbWJc8mDpGjP96QzRWL96uSeFQeR8NrzGir42e2Oy2VghU3f 5g3fdq5pseYOgFT11E9e8oajH2YnNIM= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-647-uT_YJZIUPcKdAWXZElVNlg-1; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 06:34:36 -0400 X-MC-Unique: uT_YJZIUPcKdAWXZElVNlg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: uT_YJZIUPcKdAWXZElVNlg_1777286074 Received: from mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABE9E1956054; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:34:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fweimer-oldenburg.csb.redhat.com (unknown [10.44.48.4]) by mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9E491800347; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:34:32 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Alejandro Colomar Cc: Dorjoy Chowdhury , linux-man@vger.kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, jlayton@kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] man/man3/errno.3: Document EFTYPE error code In-Reply-To: (Alejandro Colomar's message of "Sun, 26 Apr 2026 14:59:12 +0200") References: <20260426111707.36541-1-dorjoychy111@gmail.com> <20260426111707.36541-2-dorjoychy111@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 12:34:30 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.93 * Alejandro Colomar: > [CC += libc-alpha] > > Hi Dorjoy, > > On 2026-04-26T17:14:25+0600, Dorjoy Chowdhury wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Dorjoy Chowdhury > > Thanks! > > Reviewed-by: Alejandro Colomar > > I will wait until glibc adds this error code to their before > applying the patch. This means either you should write and send a patch > to glibc (if so, please CC me), or you should ask them to add it > themselves (if you're not comfortable writing glibc code). I'm not sure where this is coming from. POSIX says EFTYPE was rejected in favor of ENOTTY. Thanks, Florian