From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Jaeger Subject: Re: math_error.7 draft 4, for review Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:11:43 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Michael Kerrisk's message of "Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:56:41 +0200") Sender: linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Michael Kerrisk Cc: Fabian Kreutz , Andries Brouwer , linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Michael Kerrisk" writes: > [...] > Yes. My point is that there is no consistency across the math > functions. (And math_errhandling only tells about error reporting > behavior across all functions, so it's presence or absence isn't > really relevant to this inconsistency.) Some set errno and give an > exception, while some do one, but not the other. My brain get's rusty, it's some time I looked at all of this. So, let me state what I remember thinking some more about this: I would expect that the exceptions should be *all* correct. Errno is a different story, Andreas =2D-=20 Andreas Jaeger, Director Platform/openSUSE, aj-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG N=FCrnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint =3D 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIidEPOJpWPMJyoSYRAmmiAJsH54dtrBs0X9amv0Sxxpfb7XyHqQCfeGZ5 eCrxK2ZV1ZCll+LDNA6NDBA= =bc+6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html