From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Moyer Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] io_cancel.2: fix up the description Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:59:37 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1365104218-26042-1-git-send-email-jmoyer@redhat.com> <1365104218-26042-2-git-send-email-jmoyer@redhat.com> <20130410111422.GB1376@rei.scz.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130410111422.GB1376-WQn62CkN1y0S3W1tAdPHOtBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> (chrubis-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org's message of "Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:14:22 +0200") Sender: linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: chrubis-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" , linux-man List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org chrubis-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org writes: > Hi! >> > The description for this sytem call was a bit inaccurate. Cyril >> > still takes issue with my wording, so this is up for further >> > word-smithing, I think. I'm open to suggestions. >> >> Cyril, do you have any comment? > > It is no big deal but I think that the sentence could be a little clearer > with explicitly stating that the ctx_id is aio context and the iocb > describes the operation to be canceled. Something like: > > The > .I iocb > describes the operation to be canceled and the > .I ctx_id > is aio context the operation was submitted to. I agree that this is better. Thanks Cyril! -Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html