From: "Charlie X. Liu" <charlie@sensoray.com>
To: "'Roger Oberholtzer'" <roger@opq.se>
Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com
Subject: RE: SUGGESTION FOR A Linux based Card
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 16:05:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001001cb1fbb$32376e30$96a64a90$@com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1278712488.24682.6.camel@manta.site>
I could not all agree with your opinion, Roger. if you do a side-by-side image/video quality comparison, especially using a resolution chart as object in front of your video camera, you will see the big difference. Pay attention to aliasing artifacts.
Best regards,
Charlie X. Liu, Ph.D.
Dept. of Engineering
Sensoray Company
7313 SW Tech Center Dr.
Tigard, OR 97223, USA
Phone: (503) 684-8073
Fax: (503) 684-8164
Web: http://www.sensoray.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Oberholtzer [mailto:roger@opq.se]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 2:55 PM
To: Charlie X. Liu
Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com
Subject: RE: SUGGESTION FOR A Linux based Card
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 09:30 -0700, Charlie X. Liu wrote:
> Is it a BT878-based or SAA7134-based? If you are looking for a better quality capture card, considering a SAA7134-based is very important, since BT878 is too old and SAA713x is a newer generation one that uses more advanced technologies including using the adaptive comb filter and adaptive anti-alias filtering techniques which make big difference on image/video quality.
They have a few different cards. BT878 is not lower quality (in my
opinion when using these cards in systems to capture images for
high-speed image processing). The difference is that it does no
compression in hardware. But I thought the original poster mentioned
using ffmpeg.
We also use a 4-channel card that compresses to jpeg-2000 in hardware.
Great linux support.
It is a mistake to confuse age with quality. In this area, new sometimes
means cheaper to make, or additional features (like compression) that do
not effect the basic image capture quality.
YMMV.
--
Roger Oberholtzer
Ramböll RST/OPQ
Ramböll Sverige AB
Krukmakargatan 21
P.O. Box 17009
SE-104 62 Stockholm, Sweden
Office: Int +46 10-615 60 20
Mobile: Int +46 70-815 1696
--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-09 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-08 13:13 SUGGESTION FOR A Linux based Card Akhilesh Soni
2010-07-08 19:37 ` Charlie X. Liu
2010-07-09 6:26 ` Roger Oberholtzer
2010-07-09 16:30 ` Charlie X. Liu
2010-07-09 21:54 ` Roger Oberholtzer
2010-07-09 23:05 ` Charlie X. Liu [this message]
2010-07-11 16:53 ` Daniel Glöckner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001001cb1fbb$32376e30$96a64a90$@com' \
--to=charlie@sensoray.com \
--cc=roger@opq.se \
--cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox