From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.195]:63055 "EHLO mout.perfora.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760629AbZEMTGT (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2009 15:06:19 -0400 Message-ID: <005f01c9d3fd$e2ee8980$0a00a8c0@vorg> From: "Timothy D. Lenz" To: References: <412bdbff0905052114r7f481759r373fd0b814f458e@mail.gmail.com> <247D2127-F564-4F55-A49D-3F0F8FA63112@gmail.com> <412bdbff0905061150g2e46f919i57823c8700252926@mail.gmail.com> <412bdbff0905061410k30d7114dk97cec1cc19c47b2b@mail.gmail.com> <47468C2F-83E4-4359-A1F2-7F59AC6A0E53@gmail.com> <412bdbff0905062055k7cefb714wb496ef48464df99a@mail.gmail.com> <87F5FF15-F869-4FEC-946B-C4D6D0C9506E@gmail.com> <829197380905121356y1d76d73eu4738e3e926c11d27@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: XC5000 improvements: call for testers! Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 12:04:20 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Devin Heitmueller" To: "Britney Fransen" Cc: "Devin Heitmueller" ; "Linux Media Mailing List" Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 1:56 PM Subject: Re: XC5000 improvements: call for testers! > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Britney Fransen > wrote: > > I finally had some time to do some more testing with the beta2 tree and I > > think most of the issues I had were user error. Not exactly sure what I did > > wrong before but I am not seeing the reception issues or any regressions on > > the digital side anymore. I think why I thought I was seeing QAM64 was > > because I was using the wrong tuner. With the beta2 tree my 950q is now > > adapter1, before it was always adapter2. That could be part of what I > > thought was the reception regression as well. > > > > Thanks, > > Britney > > Hello Britney, > > Thank you for taking the time to isolate/debug the situation. The > changes should have no effect on the order of adapter1/adapter2. > Could have just been a coincidence or the order in which you plugged > in the devices compared to what they usually are at boot time. > > Glad to see that there are no longer any issues. Once I get one > outstanding Pinnacle 800i fix in, I will issue a PULL request and this > will go into the mainline. > > Cheers, > > Devin > > -- > Devin J. Heitmueller - Kernel Labs > http://www.kernellabs.com So when this goes main, next time we update from v4l we need the new firmware right?