From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@mailbox.org>
To: "André Draszik" <andre.draszik@linaro.org>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>,
"Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
"Philipp Stanner" <phasta@kernel.org>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>,
Juan Yescas <jyescas@google.com>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/drm_crtc: fix race with dma_fence_signal() in ::get_driver_name()
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 14:48:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00bb53bf021920b2387f8f7930975b8e01d25aca.camel@mailbox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708-linux-drm_crtc_fix2-v2-2-cf72be75d75a@linaro.org>
On Wed, 2026-07-08 at 16:22 +0100, André Draszik wrote:
> Since commit 541c8f2468b9 ("dma-buf: detach fence ops on signal v3"),
> I'm seeing the BUG_ON() triggering in drm_crtc's fence_to_crtc() via
> drm_crtc_fence_get_driver_name() regularly:
>
> Call trace:
> panic+0x58/0x5c
> die+0x160/0x178
> bug_brk_handler+0x70/0xa4
> call_el1_break_hook+0x3c/0x1a0
> do_el1_brk64+0x24/0x74
> el1_brk64+0x34/0x54
> el1h_64_sync_handler+0x80/0xfc
> el1h_64_sync+0x84/0x88
> drm_crtc_fence_get_driver_name+0x60/0x68 (P)
> sync_file_get_name+0x184/0x45c
> sync_file_ioctl+0x404/0xf70
> __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x124/0x1dc
>
> This looks to be caused by a code flow similar to the following:
>
> +++ snip +++
> thread A thread B
>
> ioctl(SYNC_IOC_FILE_INFO)
> sync_file_ioctl()
> sync_file_get_name()
> dma_fence_signal_timestamp_locked() dma_fence_driver_name()
> ops = rcu_dereference(fence->ops)
> if (!dma_fence_test_signaled_flag())
> ops->get_driver_name(fence) i.e.
> drm_crtc_fence_get_driver_name()
> test_and_set_bit(SIGNALED)
> RCU_INIT_POINTER(fence->ops, NULL)
> drm_crtc_fence_get_driver_name()
> BUG_ON(rcu_access_pointer(fence->ops)
> != &drm_crtc_fence_ops)
> +++ snap +++
>
> I see two ways to resolve this:
> a) simply drop the BUG_ON(). It can not work anymore since above
> commit, as it is racy now.
> b) pass the original 'ops' pointer obtained in dma_fence_driver_name()
> to all callees.
>
> This patch implements option a), as because:
> * I don't see much benefit in passing the extra pointer just for this
> BUG_ON() to work.
> * Requiring the dma_fence_ops in those callbacks is an implementation
> detail of the drm_crtc driver, and therefore upper layers shouldn't
> have to care about that.
> * The existence of the BUG_ON() doesn't appear to be consistent with
> implementations of ::get_driver_name() or ::get_timeline_name() in
> the majority of other DRM drivers in the first place. Those that do
> have a similar BUG_ON() (i915, xe) probably also need an update
> similar to this patch here but I'm not in a position to test those.
> * Using BUG() and friends to take down the system is an unacceptable
> way to handle a failure as evidenced by many threads on LKML and also
> in the kernel coding style. Here, the check was presumably added for
> detecting when something passes an invalid pointer, but that does not
> happen - and if it could, gracefully handling that situation would be
> more appropriate.
I think it was there to detect wrong fences.
I think that entire usage is effectively invalid since Christian's
rework.
>
> Note that the adjacent drm_crtc_fence_get_timeline_name() has the same
> problem and is fixed by this patch as well.
nit: It's cool to see folks write detailed commit messages, but I think
in this case it is very verbose. The presentation of the solution-
options IMO is more something for a comment in the mailing list ;)
The issue at hand is rather simple, AFAICS. Fences now set the ops
pointer to NULL on signal, which wasn't the case in the past, which
triggers the BUG_ON, which shouldn't be used anymore anyways. That's
the core of the issue.
The ops pointer never changed in the past. I suppose it was there to
check whether a wrong fence was passed to the container_of().
>
+Cc stable?
> Fixes: 541c8f2468b9 ("dma-buf: detach fence ops on signal v3")
> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
>
> ---
> v2:
> - don't turn fence_to_crtc() into macro
> - update commit message to include reference to unacceptable use of BUG
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> index d55f1377ec36..36ae50ddf525 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> @@ -154,11 +154,8 @@ static void drm_crtc_crc_fini(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> #endif
> }
>
> -static const struct dma_fence_ops drm_crtc_fence_ops;
> -
> static struct drm_crtc *fence_to_crtc(struct dma_fence *fence)
> {
> - BUG_ON(rcu_access_pointer(fence->ops) != &drm_crtc_fence_ops);
> return container_of(fence->extern_lock, struct drm_crtc, fence_lock);
> }
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 15:22 [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/drm_crtc: dma_fence_ops fixes André Draszik
2026-07-08 15:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/drm_crtc: ensure dma_fence_ops remain valid during device unbind André Draszik
2026-07-09 12:32 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-07-09 14:19 ` André Draszik
2026-07-09 14:25 ` André Draszik
2026-07-09 14:40 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-07-08 15:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/drm_crtc: fix race with dma_fence_signal() in ::get_driver_name() André Draszik
2026-07-09 12:48 ` Philipp Stanner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=00bb53bf021920b2387f8f7930975b8e01d25aca.camel@mailbox.org \
--to=phasta@mailbox.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andre.draszik@linaro.org \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jyescas@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=peter.griffin@linaro.org \
--cc=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox