From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from fep20.mx.upcmail.net ([62.179.121.40]:62433 "EHLO fep20.mx.upcmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750894Ab0LaJjW (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Dec 2010 04:39:22 -0500 Received: from edge05.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.212]) by viefep20-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.02.02 201-2260-120-106-20100312) with ESMTP id <20101231093920.ZXSM1667.viefep20-int.chello.at@edge05.upcmail.net> for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 10:39:20 +0100 Received: from pc13 (pc13 [10.1.1.13]) by minerva12.dnsalias.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBV9dHqD021555 for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2010 10:39:18 +0100 From: "Hans von Marwijk" To: References: <033c01cb9e0f$2f0efac0$8d2cf040$@ch> <05c101cba13f$41861930$c4924b90$@ch> In-Reply-To: <05c101cba13f$41861930$c4924b90$@ch> Subject: Ci+ CAM support Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 10:39:27 +0100 Message-ID: <00f301cba8ce$9ddff2a0$d99fd7e0$@ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-gb List-ID: Sender: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Hi Which hardware does have a CI+ CAM ? Does Linux support CI+ CAM or will it be implemented in the future ? Thanks Hans